Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’ debates

Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’ debates
复制标题

使用后人文主义方法对拉巴斯贫民窟中的儿童与狗的相遇进行理论化,以破坏当前“自然中的儿童”辩论中的普遍主义

DOI:
10.1080/14733285.2015.1077369
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
Children's Geographies
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Karen Malone
Karen Malone
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Karen Malone

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文运用后人文主义和新唯物主义的理论方法,对拉巴斯玻利维亚儿童与狗的种间关系进行了理论分析。这种方法允许解构的人与自然的二进制文件中发现的话语中心的儿童在自然运动。本文对儿童自然经验的普遍化提出了质疑,认为有三个命题。首先,如果儿童被视为自然,而不是在它之外,第二,物体或自然的“东西”可以被视为动画。最后,当代迫切需要将儿童重新连接到一个浪漫化的更自然的生活中,连接到儿童多样化的世俗经验中,这是多么敏感。我探索这些命题借鉴了一项研究,在那里我采用了唯物主义本体论,并使用[巴拉德,卡伦。2007.相遇宇宙中途:量子物理学和物质与意义的纠缠。达勒姆,北卡罗来纳州:杜克大学出版社]和她的内部行动的概念,通过劳蒂奥[2013年a。“口袋里装着石头的孩子:日常生活中的自供物质实践。儿童地理11(4):394-408]。基于我的儿童狗种间探索,我将通过重新解决这三个命题来结束。
This paper theorizes children's interspecies relation with dogs in La Paz Bolivia utilizing post-humanism and new materialism as its approach. This approach allows for the deconstructing of human–nature binaries found in discourses central to the children in nature movement. Questioning the universalizing of children's experience in nature the paper considers three propositions. Firstly, what if children were viewed as nature rather than outside of it. Secondly, can the objects or ‘things’ of nature be viewed as animated. And finally, how sensitive is the contemporary imperative to reconnect children to a romanticized more natured life, to children's diverse worldly experiences. I explore these propositions drawing on a study where I have adopted a materialist ontology and theorized using the work of [Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press] and her concept of intra-action as adopted by Rautio [2013a. “Children Who Carry Stones in Their Pockets: On Autotelic Material Practices in Everyday Life.” Children's Geographies 11 (4): 394–408]. Based on my child–dog interspecies exploration, I will conclude by re-addressing the three propositions.