Comparison of the Automated Random Access Immunoassay Analysers, ACS-180 (Ciba Corning) and AIA-1200 (Tosoh)
Comparison of the Automated Random Access Immunoassay Analysers, ACS-180 (Ciba Corning) and AIA-1200 (Tosoh)
复制标题
自动随机存取免疫分析仪 ACS-180 (Ciba Corning) 和 AIA-1200 (Tosoh) 的比较
DOI：
10.1515/cclm.1993.31.10.701
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Janson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Costongs;P. Janson
两台随机存取免疫分析仪ACS-180（Ciba Corning）和AIA-1200（Tosoh Corp.）在性能和用户友好性方面进行了比较。精密度研究显示，AIA-1200的试验内变异系数几乎相等，但日间重现性更好。ACS-180的肿瘤标志物稀释系列的回收率过高。由于ACS-180中的额外清洗步骤（促甲状腺激素、癌胚抗原和人绒毛膜促性腺激素）和AIA-1200中的单独移液器吸头，两种系统均无残留效应。AIA-1200的试剂稳定性优于ACS-180。AIA-1200更加用户友好，在日常操作中比ACS-180产生更高的通量（92个结果/小时vs. 78个结果/小时）。
Two random access immunoassay analysers, the ACS-180 (Ciba Corning) and the AIA-1200 (Tosoh Corp.) were compared with respect to performance and user-friendliness. Precision studies revealed an almost equal intra-assay variation coefficient, but day-to-day reproducibility was better on the AIA-1200. Recovery of dilution series of tumour markers was too high with the ACS-180. Both systems were free from carry-over effects, on account of the extra wash step in the ACS-180 (for thyrotropin, carcinoembryonic antigen and human chorionic gonadotropin) and the separate pipetting tip in the AIA-1200. Reagent stability is better in the AIA-1200 than in the ACS-180. The AIA-1200 is more user-friendly and produces a higher throughput than the ACS-180 in daily routine operation (92 results/hour vs. 78 results/hour).