The precarious couple effect: verbally inhibited men + critical, disinhibited women = bad chemistry.

The precarious couple effect: verbally inhibited men + critical, disinhibited women = bad chemistry.
复制标题

不稳定的夫妻效应:言语压抑的男性挑剔,女性不拘束=糟糕的化学反应。

DOI:
10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1095
复制
发表时间:
2003
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
Gosling,SamuelD
Gosling,SamuelD
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Swann,WilliamB;Rentfrow,PeterJ;Gosling,SamuelD

文献摘要

相似文献

当挑剔的、言语不受抑制的女性与言语抑制的男性配对时,关系质量会受到影响,使关系变得不稳定。理论上,当(a)言语抑制的女性与相对抑制的男性(男性抑制型夫妇)配对时,以及(B)男性抑制型夫妇中女性的抑制解除放大了女性的批判性并疏远了男性时,这种效应就会出现。三项研究(N = 437,300和564)提供的证据表明,关系质量受到男性更多的抑制夫妇;第四项研究(N= 168)表明,在男性更多的抑制夫妇中,女性的批评确实会破坏关系质量。理解的影响,性别期望的关系和整合行为和人格的方法来密切的关系进行了讨论。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c)2017阿帕,保留所有权利)
When critical, verbally disinhibited women are paired with verbally inhibited men, relationship quality suffers, rendering the relationship precarious. This effect theoretically emerges when (a) verbally disinhibited women pair with relatively inhibited men (man-more-inhibited couples) and (b) the disinhibition of women in man-more-inhibited couples amplifies women's criticalness and alienates men. Three studies (Ns= 437, 300, and 564) provided evidence that relationship quality suffered in man-more-inhibited couples; a 4th study (N= 168) showed that the criticalness of women in man-more-inhibited couples did indeed undermine relationship quality. Implications for understanding the impact of gender expectations on relationships and for integrating behavioral and personological approaches to close relationships are discussed.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved)