Taking stock of campus mentoring ecosystems: a peer assessment dialogue exercise
Taking stock of campus mentoring ecosystems: a peer assessment dialogue exercise
复制标题
DOI：
10.1108/ijmce-09-2022-0072
复制
发表时间：
2023-09-12
影响因子：
1.2
通讯作者：
Mondisa, Joi-Lynn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Packard, Becky Wai-Ling;Montgomery, Beronda L.;Mondisa, Joi-Lynn
PurposeThe的目的是研究多个校园团队的经验，因为他们从事的评估，他们的科学，技术，工程和数学（STEM）辅导生态系统内同行评估对话exercise.Design/方法/approachThis项目利用了一个定性的multicase研究方法，涉及六个校园团队，利用完成的库存和视觉映射文物，会话观察和汇报采访。校园包括美利坚合众国各地的研究型大学、小型学院和少数群体服务机构。作者分析了同行评估对话练习的功能支架参与者的学习生态系统的协同作用和threats.FindingsThe结果说明了教练建模，团队内的过程时间和多轮同行评估的好处。参与者获得了新的见解到自己的校园和增加的可能性，通过与同行campuss.Research的限制/implicationsThis项目涉及的团队从一个小的机构，依靠观察和自我报告的汇报数据的对话感。未来的研究中心的观点机构leader.Practical implicationsThe作者建议专门的时间来机构评估辅导生态系统。投资于一个校园范围内的辅导基础设施可以与校园equity goals.Originality/valueIn相反的研究，只专注于指导方案的成果，本研究探讨了战略，以加强机构的辅导生态系统在高等教育，重点是同行评估，对话和学习练习。
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the experiences of multiple campus teams as they engaged in the assessment of their science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) mentoring ecosystems within a peer assessment dialogue exercise.Design/methodology/approachThis project utilized a qualitative multicase study method involving six campus teams, drawing upon completed inventory and visual mapping artefacts, session observations and debriefing interviews. The campuses included research universities, small colleges and minority-serving institutions (MSIs) across the United States of America. The authors analysed which features of the peer assessment dialogue exercise scaffolded participants' learning about ecosystem synergies and threats.FindingsThe results illustrated the benefit of instructor modelling, intra-team process time and multiple rounds of peer assessment. Participants gained new insights into their own campuses and an increased sense of possibility by dialoguing with peer campuses.Research limitations/implicationsThis project involved teams from a small set of institutions, relying on observational and self-reported debriefing data. Future research could centre perspectives of institutional leaders.Practical implicationsThe authors recommend dedicating time to the institutional assessment of mentoring ecosystems. Investing in a campus-wide mentoring infrastructure could align with campus equity goals.Originality/valueIn contrast to studies that have focussed solely on programmatic outcomes of mentoring, this study explored strategies to strengthen institutional mentoring ecosystems in higher education, with a focus on peer assessment, dialogue and learning exercises.