Assessing research self-efficacy in physician-scientists: The clinical research appraisal inventory
Assessing research self-efficacy in physician-scientists: The clinical research appraisal inventory
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1069072707301232
复制
发表时间：
2007-08-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Betz, Nancy E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mullikin, Elizabeth A.;Bakken, Lori L.;Betz, Nancy E.
在1980年至1993年间，只有19%的医学院毕业生选择了承担研究责任的教师。妇女和少数民族尽管人数不断增加，但只占其中的一小部分。作者的目标是研究人类代理，特别是自我效能，对医生研究人员，特别是女性和有色人种的职业发展的影响;因此，我们开发了一个可靠和有效的库存，用于评估临床研究自我效能在临床研究职业培训的医生人群中。量表项目从专家知识、相关文献和现有库存中汇总，以创建一个92项临床研究评估库存，对其进行因素分析并重新填充，以包括88项。虽然已经开发了工具，成功地评估研究自我效能，这是第一个工具，旨在评估自我效能在临床研究领域使用的人口的学术医生。
Between 1980 and 1993, only 19% of medical school graduates chose faculty appointments with research responsibilities. Women and minorities represent only a small fraction of these, despite their growing numbers. The authors' goal is to study the effects of human agency, particularly self-efficacy, on the career development of physician researchers, especially women and people of color; therefore, we developed a reliable and valid inventory for assessing clinical research self-efficacy in a population of physicians training for clinical research careers. Scale items were pooled from expert knowledge, relevant literature, and existing inventories to create a 92-item Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory that was factor analyzed and refilled to include 88 items. Although instruments have been developed to successfully assess research self-efficacy, this is the first instrument designed to assess self-efficacy in the clinical research domain using a population of academic physicians.