Interrater and intrarater reliability of the assisting hand assessment
Interrater and intrarater reliability of the assisting hand assessment
复制标题
DOI：
10.5014/ajot.61.1.79
复制
发表时间：
2007-01-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Eliasson, Ann-Christin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Holmefur, Marie;Krumlinde-Sundholm, Lena;Eliasson, Ann-Christin
OBJECTIVE.本研究的目的是评估辅助手评估的评价者间和评价者内的信度。对于评分者间的信度，使用了两种设计：2个职业治疗师评定相同的18名儿童，和20个职业治疗师评定相同的8名儿童。对于评价者内部的可靠性，20名评价者每人对一个孩子进行两次评价。使用了该文书的英文版和瑞典文版。计算组内相关系数（ICC）和测量标准误（SEM）。评分者间的ICC总分为0.98（2名评分者）和0.97（20名评分者），评分者内的ICC总分为0.99。评分者间的SEM为1.5，评分者内的SEM为1.2，评分者间的误差区间为3，评分者内的误差区间为+/- 2.4。这项研究显示了良好的评分者间和评分者内的信度总和。
OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to evaluate interrater and intrarater reliability for the Assisting Hand Assessment.METHOD. For interrater reliability, two designs were used: 2 occupational therapists rated the same 18 children, and 20 occupational therapists rated the same 8 children. For intrarater reliability, 20 raters each rated one child twice. Both English and Swedish versions of the instrument were used. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated.RESULTS. ICCs for the sum score for the interrater were 0.98 (two raters) and 0.97 (20 raters) and for the intrarater 0.99. SEM was 1.5 for interrater and 1.2 for the intrarater study, which gave an error interval of 3 raw scores for interrater and +/- 2.4 raw scores for intrarater.CONCLUSION. This study shows excellent interrater and intrarater reliability for sum scores.