p38 map kinase substrate specificity differs greatly for protein and peptide substrates
p38 map kinase substrate specificity differs greatly for protein and peptide substrates
复制标题
DOI:
10.1006/abbi.2000.2005
复制
发表时间:
2000-10-15
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
LoGrasso, P
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hawkins, J;Zheng, S;LoGrasso, P
To understand the molecular features that give rise to p38 substrate specificity, we compared the specificity constants, kcat/Km, and the free energy associated with protein versus peptide substrate binding for a variety of p38 substrates. Our results showed that proteins were up to 1320-fold better substrates for p38 compared to their peptide counterparts. Moreover, comparison of sequence elements revealed that in the context of a peptide substrate, but not a protein substrate, the sequence PXT/SP was preferred for catalysis. Finally, in the context of a peptide, the increased binding affinity ascribed to the p-11 position as seen with peptide inhibitors of protein kinase A (PKA), 2 was not present in p38 peptide substrates containing a p-11 residue. These results taken in the context of the ordered sequential kinetic mechanism for p38 suggest that the choice of substrate for p38 will likely have effects on the measured binding of ATP and inhibitor. p38 is a member of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase family that is activated in response to stimuli such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), TNF-, and IL-1 (1–3). TNF-and IL-1 are proinflammatory cytokines which play a predominant role in chronic inflammation (4), and agents that block their function have been clinically successful in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn’s disease (5–9). Moreover, selective p38 inhibitors lower plasma TNF-levels and are efficacious in animal models of arthritis (10). Many aspects of p38 activation by MAP kinase kinases (MKKs)(3, 11–13), its kinetic mechanism (14), and its inhibition by compounds that compete with ATP for binding have been described (14–18). However, with the exception of the description of downstream substrates for p38 (3, 18–20), there has been no characterization of the molecular features that give rise to p38 substrate specificity. While reports on the peptide substrate specificity of extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK 1 and 2) MAP kinase family members have been described (21), understanding of the specificity determinants for protein and peptide substrates for other MAP kinase family members such as p38 and c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) have not been investigated. Using synthetic peptides that correspond to natural phosphorylation sites in known p38 substrates, we compared kcat/Km values to determine what substrates were best for p38 and what amino acid residues were responsible for the specificity. Furthermore, the binding energy of a group or groups represented by X in a larger substrate such as a protein can be compared to that in a smaller substrate such as a peptide and is given by (22)