Tradition of the diagrams, tradition of the text: A case study
Tradition of the diagrams, tradition of the text: A case study
复制标题
图表的传统，文本的传统：案例研究
DOI：
10.1007/s11229-012-0073-3
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
Ken Saito
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Y.Kobayashi;T.Shibata;Y.Hoshi;Y.Kuno;M.Okada;K.Yamazaki;Ken Saito
在解释了欧几里得《几何要素》希腊手稿中的图解等一般特征之后，我们对第三卷中某些命题中的图解进行了详细的考察。法典P （Vat）gr. 190)和b （Bologna）在一些命题中避免过度规范是常见的。然而，进一步检查第三卷在其他手稿中的图表，包括阿拉伯传统的图表，并对文本进行整理，表明P和b抄本图表的共同特征是由于避免过度规范或传统污染的独立努力。手稿F （Florence, Laurenziana 28.3）最常与第三卷的手稿P重合。
After explaining general characteristics such as overspecification, found in the diagrams of Greek manuscripts of Euclid’s Elements, diagrams in some propositions of Book III are examined in detail. Codex P (Vat. gr. 190) and b (Bologna) are common in avoiding overspecification in a couple of propositions. However, further examination of diagrams of Book III in other manuscripts including those in the Arabic tradition, and collation of the text suggest that the common feature in the diagrams of codex P and b is rather due either to independent efforts to avoid overspecification or to contamination of traditions. It is codex F (Florence, Laurenziana 28.3) that most often coincides with codex P in Book III.