When old and frail is not the same: Dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods
When old and frail is not the same: Dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/17470210903049963
复制
发表时间：
2010-01-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Rothermund, Klaus
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gast, Anne;Rothermund, Klaus
它并不总是清楚是否内隐态度措施评估的态度单一刺激或类别的态度。然而，这对于解释内隐态度效应和选择最适合个人研究目标的测试都是重要的。我们调查了四个内隐测量：标准的内隐联想测验（IAT），IAT-无编码（IAT-RF），和两个版本的外部情感西蒙任务（EAST，识别（ID）-EAST）。在标准IAT的效果反映了类别和单一刺激的评价，而IAT-RF措施的类别只对态度。EAST的两个版本都独立于类别评估来测量单个刺激的评估。三种不同的影响源被区分：对单一刺激的态度（IAT; EAST和ID-EAST），对目标类别的态度（IAT和IAT-RF），和重编码过程（IAT），这并不一定反映态度。
It is not always clear whether implicit attitude measures assess the attitude towards single stimuli or the attitude towards categories. Nevertheless, this is important to knowboth for interpreting implicit attitude effects and for selecting the test that is most appropriate for individual research aims. We investigated this for four implicit measures: the standard Implicit Association Test (IAT), the IAT-recoding free (IAT-RF), and two versions of the Extrinsic Affective Simon Task (EAST, identification (ID)-EAST). Effects in the standard IAT reflect evaluations of categories and single stimuli, whereas the IAT-RF measures attitudes towards categories only. Both versions of the EAST measure evaluations of single stimuli independently from the evaluation of categories. Three different effect sources are distinguished: attitudes towards single stimuli (IAT; EAST and ID-EAST), attitudes towards target categories (IAT and IAT-RF), and processes of recoding (IAT), which do not necessarily reflect attitudes.