Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Academic Integrity in the Internet Age
Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Academic Integrity in the Internet Age
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_55
复制
发表时间：
2016-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Basanta, Giselle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rogerson, Ann M.;Basanta, Giselle
收费服务的兴起导致了文件共享网站的激增，在这些网站上，分级的工作、学术和机构材料在互联网上免费共享、交换和交易，或者与论文米尔斯相比，成本大大降低。文件共享网站以信息存储库、学生支持社区和援助中心的名义运作，诱使贡献者和用户通过交换安排回收和重新利用材料。文件共享网站在学生社区中越来越受欢迎。这是由于网站是免费或低成本的，易于访问，节省时间的机会和与评估任务和考试相关的成绩提高潜力，所有这些都辅之以看似低的使用检测风险。存放和共享的信息在费用方面可能是“免费的”，但这并不意味着它不受义务的约束，包括对原作者的确认、对信息可信度的评估以及对法律的框架和机构政策的遵守。本节回顾了什么适合共享和什么不适合共享之间存在的模糊界限、使用免费材料背后的动机以及共享、交换和交易材料的法律的影响，例如违反版权、知识产权和机构政策。限制或规避文件共享网站的能力，以促进学术不诚实的考虑也进行了讨论。
The rise of fee-for-service assignment preparation services has led to the proliferation of file sharing sites where graded work, academic and institutional materials are shared, swapped, and traded over the Internet for no payment, or at greatly reduced costs compared to essay mills. File sharing sites operate under the guise of information repositories, student support communities and assistance centers tempting contributors and users to recycle and repurpose materials through exchange arrangements. The popularity of file sharing sites is growing in student communities. This is due to sites being fee-free or low cost, the ease of access, time saving opportunities and grade improvement potential related to assessment tasks and exams, all complemented by the seemingly low risk of detection of use. The information housed and shared may be "free" in terms of cost, but it does not mean that it is free from obligation, including the acknowledgement of the original authors, assessing the credibility of information and compliance with legal frameworks and institutional policies. This section reviews the blurred lines that exist between what is and is not appropriate to share, the motivation behind the use of fee-free materials, and the legal implications of sharing, swapping, and trading materials such as breaches in copyright, intellectual property, and institutional policies. Considerations for limiting or circumventing the ability of file sharing sites to facilitate academic dishonesty are also discussed.