Linking the Child Behavior Checklist to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
Linking the Child Behavior Checklist to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/pas0001083
复制
发表时间：
2022-03
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Cella, David
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mansolf, Maxwell;Blackwell, Courtney K;Cummings, Peter;Choi, Seohyun;Cella, David
儿童行为量表（CBCL）和优势和困难问卷（SDQ）都测量儿童和青少年的情绪和行为问题，这两种工具的得分高度相关。当行政需要迫使从业人员改变所使用的工具或从两个措施的数据相结合，进行汇总分析，就有必要比较两个工具的分数。为了进行这种比较，我们在2-17岁的三个年龄组中对CBCL和SDQ的三个领域（内化，外化和总问题）进行了评分。在评估链接假设后，我们比较了项目反应理论（IRT）和等百分位数链接方法，以确定统计上最合理的链接，最终选择等百分位数链接与对数线性平滑，因为它的偏差最小，并且能够将原始SDQ评分与CBCL的T评分和原始评分联系起来。我们推导出人行横道转换表转换得分的一个措施的度量的其他和讨论使用这些表在研究和实践中。
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) both measure emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents, and scores on the two instruments are highly correlated. When administrative needs compel practitioners to change the instrument used or data from the two measures are combined to perform pooled analyses, it becomes necessary to compare scores on the two instruments. To enable such comparisons, we score linked three domains (Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems) of the CBCL and SDQ in three age groups spanning 2–17 years. After assessing linking assumptions, we compared item response theory (IRT) and equipercentile linking methods to identify the most statistically justifiable link, ultimately selecting equipercentile linking with loglinear smoothing due to its minimal bias and the ability to link raw SDQ scores with both T-scores and raw scores from the CBCL. We derived crosswalk conversion tables to convert scores on one measure to the metric of the other and discuss the use of these tables in research and practice.