Evaluation of the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey in women
Evaluation of the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey in women
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/00005768-200007000-00022
复制
发表时间：
2000-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jackson, K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ainsworth, BE;Sternfeld, B;Jackson, K
目的：评估Kaiser体力活动调查（KPAS）的重测信度，并与50名具有广泛体力活动习惯的女性（20-60岁）的体力活动（PA）的直接和间接测量方法进行比较。方法：根据Baecke通常的身体活动调查，专门设计了KPAS来评估女性的活动。它提供了四个总结活动指标：家务/照顾、积极的生活习惯、运动和职业。将汇总指标与直接（Caltrac加速计和PA记录）和间接（心肺适能（V) / dotO(2)峰值）和体脂百分比）PA标准测量进行比较。参与者记录了两个7天的详细PA记录，间隔1个月。Caltrac加速计与PA记录同时佩戴。结果：各指标1个月重测信度均具有较高的类内相关性（r = 0.79 ~ 0.91, P < 0.01）。年龄调整后的KPAS运动/锻炼与积极生活习惯指标的Spearman rho相关性为(V)超过dotO(2)峰值（r = 0.34 ~ 0.76, P < 0.01）和体脂率（r = - 0.30 ~ -0.59, P < 0.05）。KPAS护理和职业指标与Caltrac kcal.d（-1）相关（r = 0.30 ~ 0.44, P < 0.05）。来自KPAS和PA记录的类似活动之间的相关性从r = 0.03到0.64不等。每日，来自KPAS和PA记录的习惯活动具有最高的相关性（r >.28）。不频繁活动的相关性较低（r < 0.05）。结论：KPAS在检测具有广泛体育活动习惯的女性的日常家务/照料职业、体育/锻炼和积极的休闲活动方面具有较好的信度和较好的准确性。
Purpose: The Kaiser Physical Activity Survey (KPAS) was evaluated for test-retest reliability and comparison with direct and indirect measures of physical activity (PA) in 50 women (ages 20-60 yr) with a broad range of physical activity (PA) habits. Methods: The KPAS, an adaptation of the Baecke usual physical activity survey, was designed specifically to assess activity in women. It provides four summary activity indexes: housework/caregiving, active living habits, sports, and occupation. Summary indexes were compared against direct (Caltrac accelerometer and PA records) and indirect (cardiorespiratory fitness ((V)over dotO(2) peak) and percent body fat) criterion measures of PA. Participants kept detailed PA records for two, 7-d periods, separated by 1 month. Caltrac accelerometers were worn concurrently with the PA records. Results: Intraclass correlations for 1-month test-retest reliability were high for all KPAS indexes (r = 0.79 to 0.91, P < 0.01). Age-adjusted Spearman rho correlations between the KPAS sports/exercise and active living habits indexes were of moderate magnitude for (V)over dotO(2) peak (r = 0.34 to 0.76, P < 0.01) and percent body fat (r = -.30 to -0.59, P < 0.05). KPAS caregiving and occupation indexes were related to Caltrac kcal.d(-1) (r = 0.30 to 0.44, P < 0.05). Correlations between similar activities from the KPAS and PA records ranged from r = 0.03 to 0.64. Daily, habitual activities from the KPAS and PA records had the highest correlations (r > 0.28). Correlations among infrequent activities were lower (r < 0.05). Conclusion: The KPAS demonstrated good reliability and was reasonably accurate in detecting regular housework/caregiving occupation, sports/exercise, and active leisure activities among women with a broad range of physical activity habits.