In the Social Factory?
In the Social Factory?
复制标题
在社会工厂？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Pratt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rosalind Gill;A. Pratt
这篇文章专门介绍了一个关于不稳定和文化工作的部分。它的目的是使三种思想进行对话-自治的马克思主义“意大利实验室”的工作;关于不稳定和不稳定的激进主义著作;以及在艺术家、设计师和（新）媒体工作者作为所谓的模范企业家“创造性阶层”占据中心舞台的时刻，与文化工作的独特特征有关的新兴经验主义学术。文章分为三个部分。它首先介绍了自主的马克思主义传统的思想，突出了关于劳动自主性，信息资本主义和“无墙工厂”的论点，以及诸如群众和非物质劳动等关键概念。第二部分将讨论这些思想和歌剧政治对不稳定性运动的影响，讨论一些在这场运动内外引起激烈辩论的问题，这场运动经常将文化工作者视为新的“不稳定性”经验的例证。在第三部分，也是最后一部分，我们将转向关于文化工作的经验文献，在与已经讨论过的观点进行辩论之前，指出其主要特征。阐述了几个重叠和批评的点-特别关注影响，时间性，主观性和团结的问题。
This article introduces a special section concerned with precariousness and cultural work. Its aim is to bring into dialogue three bodies of ideas — the work of the autonomous Marxist `Italian laboratory'; activist writings about precariousness and precarity; and the emerging empirical scholarship concerned with the distinctive features of cultural work, at a moment when artists, designers and (new) media workers have taken centre stage as a supposed `creative class' of model entrepreneurs. The article is divided into three sections. It starts by introducing the ideas of the autonomous Marxist tradition, highlighting arguments about the autonomy of labour, informational capitalism and the `factory without walls', as well as key concepts such as multitude and immaterial labour. The impact of these ideas and of Operaismo politics more generally on the precarity movement is then considered in the second section, discussing some of the issues that have animated debate both within and outside this movement, which has often treated cultural workers as exemplifying the experiences of a new `precariat'. In the third and final section we turn to the empirical literature about cultural work, pointing to its main features before bringing it into debate with the ideas already discussed. Several points of overlap and critique are elaborated — focusing in particular on issues of affect, temporality, subjectivity and solidarity.