No small task: therapeutic targeting of Lp(a) for cardiovascular disease.
No small task: therapeutic targeting of Lp(a) for cardiovascular disease.
复制标题
任务艰巨:Lp(a) 治疗心血管疾病的靶向治疗。
DOI:
10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31329-0
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Feinberg,MarkW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Feinberg,MarkW
Despite primary and secondary prevention efforts, ischaemic cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) over the past decade have revealed dozens of loci associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease that could serve as potential new targets for therapy. Among them are genes that affect LDL metabolism such as LPA, which encodes for the glycoprotein apolipoprotein (a), a principle component of the LDL-like particle lipoprotein (a)(Lp [a]). Several observations suggest that targeting of Lp (a) could offer a unique strategy to decrease residual cardiovascular risk. Increased plasma concentrations of Lp (a) are significantly associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease, 1 and mendelian gene randomisation studies examining single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in or nearby the LPA gene strongly suggest that genetically increased Lp (a) results in increased risk of coronary artery disease. 2, 3 Apheresis studies of patients with high Lp (a) concentrations, despite LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) lower than 100 mg/dL, demonstrate significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events, an effect ascribed to lowering of Lp (a) and not LDL-C. 4, 5 Finally, studies of statins have revealed that despite a significant reduction in LDL-C and major adverse cardiovascular events, Lp (a) plasma concentrations are not reduced. 6, 7 GWAS have also identified SNPs in or nearby the LPA gene to be significantly associated with myocardial infarction, stroke, and calcific aortic valve disease, suggesting the potential involvement of Lp (a) in a broad range of cardiovascular disease states. 8 In The Lancet, Nicholas Viney and colleagues9 report findings from two randomised, placebo-controlled trials of two antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) with different modified chemistries targeting Lp (a). In the first study, a phase 2 trial, subcutaneous IONIS-APO (a) Rx (dose100–300 mg) once a week for 12 weeks led to greater reductions in Lp (a), oxidised phospholipids, LDL-C, and apolipoprotein B (apoB) concentrations than did placebo in 64 participants with high or very high Lp (a) concentrations; noteworthy since two-thirds were already taking statins or lipid-modulating therapies. IONIS-APO (a) Rx also reduced monocyte migration (percentage of monocytes added to the culture that transmigrated across the endothelium), suggesting beneficial effects on a key inflammatory process leading to atherogenesis.In the second study, a phase 1/2a first-in-man trial enrolling 58 healthy participants with elevated Lp (a) concentrations, both single and multiple doses of subcutaneous IONIS-APO (a)-LRx over 22 days reduced Lp (a) concentrations compared with placebo. APO (a)-LRx treatment in the multiple-dose cohort resulted in potent reductions in Lp (a) concentrations in the 10 mg group (mean reduction 66%[SD 21· 8]), 20 mg group (80%[13· 7]), and 40 mg group (92%[6· 5]) by day 36 (p= 0· 0007 for all vs placebo). These reductions were sustained over 3–4 months by nearly half of participants in the single-dose groups and up to four-fifths of those in multiple-dose groups. IONIS-APO (a)-LRx seemed to have an up to 30-times higher potency than IONIS-APO (a) Rx. Participants in the highest singledose (120 mg) and multiple-dose (20 mg and 40 mg) groups also had significantly greater mean reductions in oxidised phospholipids, LDL-C, and apoB than had those assigned to placebo. The emerging recognition that oxidised phospholipids and apoB conspire to induce inflammation in the vessel wall suggests that