The pattern of Lapita settlement in Fiji
The pattern of Lapita settlement in Fiji
复制标题
斐济拉皮塔人定居点的格局
DOI：
10.1002/j.1834-4453.2001.tb00480.x
复制
发表时间：
2001
影响因子：
0.9
通讯作者：
Atholl Anderson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Clark;Atholl Anderson
在大陆和海洋的地理尺度上，放射性碳年代学对于校准史前人口的扩张和理解扩散过程的类型是很重要的。在斐济，殖民化阶段相对较短-在大多数C14日期的两个标准差内-拉皮塔遗址和物质文化套房之间存在显着差异。为了研究这种变化，三种模型的群岛内分散审查对四类考古数据，研究在分散的斐济群岛的定居模式。最初的殖民可能仅限于西斐济，并可能代表了拉皮塔向东扩张的群岛间间隙。东斐济后来在第二阶段的系统殖民中定居，该阶段以Lakeba为中心，并吸收了Lau集团的非大陆小岛屿。
At continental and oceanic geographic scales radiocarbon chronologies are important for calibrating the expansion of prehistoric populations, and understanding the type of dispersal process. In Fiji where the colonisation phase was relatively brief — within two standard deviations of most C14 dates — there are significant differences between Lapita sites and material culture suites. To investigate this variability three models of intra-archipelagic dispersal are reviewed against four categories of archaeological data to examine the pattern of settlement in the scattered Fiji Islands. Initial colonisation was probably restricted to west Fiji and may represent an inter-archipelago hiatus in Lapita expansion eastward. East Fiji was settled later during a second phase of systematic colonisation that centered on Lakeba and took in the small non-continental islands of the Lau Group.