Feasibility of Reducing Older Adults' Sedentary Time

Feasibility of Reducing Older Adults' Sedentary Time
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.020
复制
发表时间:
2011-08-01
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Owen, Neville
Owen, Neville
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gardiner, Paul A.;Eakin, Elizabeth G.;Owen, Neville

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:久坐不动的时间(太多的坐着,从缺乏锻炼)是一个普遍的风险,以健康在老年人。目的:检查干预的可行性,以减少和打破久坐不动的时间在老年人。设计:一个前实验(前后)study.Setting/participants:共59名参与者年龄>= 60岁,从布里斯班,澳大利亚。数据收集于2009年5月至2010年12月,并在2010年进行分析。干预:一次面对面的目标设定咨询和一次个性化定制的邮件提供反馈,对加速度计得出的久坐时间,基于社会认知理论和行为选择理论。由加速度计得出的久坐时间、轻强度体力活动(利帕)和中等至剧烈强度体力活动(MVPA)的变化(在干预前和干预后6天内进行评估);和参与者satisfactions.Results:达到87.5%的筛选和合格;保留是100%。从干预前到干预后,参与者减少了久坐时间[-3.2%(95%CI =-4.18,-2.14),p
Background: Sedentary time (too much sitting, as distinct from lack of exercise) is a prevalent risk to health among older adults.Purpose: Examine the feasibility of an intervention to reduce and break up sedentary time in older adults.Design: A pre-experimental (pre-post) study.Setting/participants: A total of 59 participants aged >= 60 years from Brisbane, Australia. Data were collected between May and December 2009 and analyzed in 2010.Intervention: One face-to-face goal-setting consultation and one individually tailored mailing providing feedback on accelerometer-derived sedentary time, grounded in social cognitive theory and behavioral choice theory.Main outcome measures: Program reach and retention; changes in accelerometer-derived sedentary time, light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) (assessed over 6 days in pre- and post-intervention periods); and participant satisfaction.Results: Reach was 87.5% of those screened and eligible; retention was 100%. From pre- to post-intervention, participants decreased their sedentary time [-3.2% (95% CI= -4.18, -2.14), p