A Clinical Score for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

A Clinical Score for Predicting Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
复制标题

DOI:
10.1159/000476030
复制
发表时间:
2017-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Shah, Nigam H.
Shah, Nigam H.
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kwong, Calvin;Ling, Albee Y.;Shah, Nigam H.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:在隐源性卒中(CS)或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后患者中检测心房颤动(AF)具有重要的治疗意义。研究方法:为了对CS/TIA患者进行风险分层,以预防以后发生AF,我们使用斯坦福大学转化研究综合数据库环境(STRIDE)中1995年至2015年的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。结果:在纳入的9,589例CS/TIA成人患者(年龄≥ 40岁)中,482例(5%)患者在CS/TIA后发生AF。在这些患者中,分别有28.4%、26.3%和45.3%的患者在指数CS/TIA后1-12个月、1-3年和>3年被诊断为AF。年龄(>= 75岁)、肥胖、充血性心力衰竭、高血压、冠状动脉疾病、外周血管疾病和瓣膜疾病是显著的危险因素,其各自的比值比(95%CI)如下:1.73(1.39-2.16)、1.53(1.05-2.18)、3.34(2.61-4.28)、2.01(1.53-2.68)、1.72(1.35-2.19)、1.37(1.02-1.84)和2.05(1.55-2.69)。风险评分系统,即,HAVOC评分使用这7个临床变量构建,其成功地将患者分层为3个风险组,具有良好的模型区分(曲线下面积= 0.77)。结论:本研究的结果支持在CS/TIA后患者中寻找更长时间和更难的AF的策略。HAVOC评分可识别不同程度的AF风险,并可用于选择患者进行延长心律监测。(C)2017 S. Karger AG,巴塞尔
Objectives: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in post-cryptogenic stroke (CS) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients carries important therapeutic implications. Methods: To risk stratify CS/TIA patients for later development of AF, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 1995 to 2015 in the Stanford Translational Research Integrated Database Environment (STRIDE). Results: Of the 9,589 adult patients (age >= 40 years) with CS/TIA included, 482 (5%) patients developed AF post CS/TIA. Of those patients, 28.4, 26.3, and 45.3% were diagnosed with AF 1-12 months, 1-3 years, and >3 years after the index CS/TIA, respectively. Age (>= 75 years), obesity, congestive heart failure, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and valve disease are significant risk factors, with the following respective odds ratios (95% CI): 1.73 (1.39-2.16), 1.53 (1.05-2.18), 3.34 (2.61-4.28), 2.01 (1.53-2.68), 1.72 (1.35-2.19), 1.37 (1.02-1.84), and 2.05 (1.55-2.69). A risk-scoring system, i.e., the HAVOC score, was constructed using these 7 clinical variables that successfully stratify patients into 3 risk groups, with good model discrimination (area under the curve = 0.77). Conclusions: Findings from this study support the strategy of looking longer and harder for AF in post-CS/TIA patients. The HAVOC score identifies different levels of AF risk and may be used to select patients for extended rhythm monitoring. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel