A comparison of ranking and rating procedures for value system measurement
A comparison of ranking and rating procedures for value system measurement
复制标题
价值体系衡量的排名和评级程序的比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1980
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Grube
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Rankin;J. Grube
比较了两种数值测量方法的效度和信度。296名学生（女161名，男135名）填写了两种测量方法和态度问卷。罗克奇价值调查要求学生根据重要性分别对两组18个价值进行排序。价值调查的评级版本要求学生对同样的36个值从1到99进行评级。236人6周后返回，再次填写两项测量技术。多方法因子分析结果表明，给定值的4个测量值（2个技术× 2次）之间有很好的收敛效度，不同值的测量值之间有很好的区分效度。可能是由于排序过程的消极性质，排序测量的重测信度比评定测量的重测信度高。由多元回归和方差分析确定的两种测量技术的结构效度相似。尽管对排名程序提出了批评，但排名版本和评级版本都具有相同的信度和效度。
Compared the validity and reliability of 2 value measurement techniques. 296 Ss (161 females and 135 males) in introductory psychology filled out the 2 measurement techniques and an attitude survey. The Rokeach Value Survey instructed Ss to separately rank 2 sets of 18 values in order of importance. A rating version of the Value Survey instructed Ss to rate the same 36 values from 1 to 99. 236 Sreturned 6 weeks later and again filled out both measurement techniques. Results of the multimethod factor analysis indicate very good convergent validity among the 4 measures of a given value (2 techniques × 2 sessions) and very good discriminant validity between measures of different values. Probably due to the ipsative nature of the ranking procedure, the test-retest reliabilities were higher for the ranked measurements than for the rated measurements. The construct validity of both measurement techniques, as determined by multiple regression and analysis of variance, were similar. Despite criticisms of ranking procedures, both the ranked and the rated versions were of equal reliability and validity.