Whites' County-Level Racial Bias, COVID-19 Rates, and Racial Inequities in the United States.

Whites' County-Level Racial Bias, COVID-19 Rates, and Racial Inequities in the United States.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph17228695
复制
发表时间:
2020-11-23
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Vittinghoff E
Vittinghoff E
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thomas MD;Michaels EK;Darling-Hammond S;Nguyen TT;Glymour MM;Vittinghoff E

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

越来越多的证据表明,美国 (US) 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 的结果存在相当大的种族不平等。地区层面的种族偏见与多种不良健康结果有关,但其与 COVID-19 的关联尚未得到探索。结合非西班牙裔白人中隐性和显性反黑人偏见的隐式项目、约翰霍普金斯大学冠状病毒资源中心和《纽约时报》的县级数据,我们使用调整后的线性回归来估计截至 2020 年 7 月 1 日的总体 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率、截至 2020 年 5 月 28 日的黑人和白人发病率,以及平均地区隐性和显性种族偏见的黑人与白人发病率差距。在 2994 个县中,平均 COVID-19 死亡率(标准差)为 1.7/10,000 人 (3.3),平均累计 COVID-19 发病率为 52.1/10,000 人 (77.2)。较高的种族偏见与较高的总体死亡率相关(每 1 个标准差较高的隐性偏见 b = 0.65/10,000(95% 置信区间:0.39, 0.91);显性偏见 b = 0.49/10,000(0.27, 0.70))和较高的总体发病率(隐性偏见 b = 8.42/10,000(4.64, 12.20);显性偏差 b = 8.83/10,000 (5.32, 12.35))。在 957 个拥有特定种族数据的县中,较高的种族偏见预示着较高的白人和黑人发病率,以及较大的黑人与白人发病率差距。白人中的反黑人偏见预示着 COVID-19 的结果会更糟,不平等也会加剧。地区一级的干预措施可以改善健康不平等现象。
Mounting evidence reveals considerable racial inequities in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes in the United States (US). Area-level racial bias has been associated with multiple adverse health outcomes, but its association with COVID-19 is yet unexplored. Combining county-level data from Project Implicit on implicit and explicit anti-Black bias among non-Hispanic Whites, Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center, and The New York Times, we used adjusted linear regressions to estimate overall COVID-19 incidence and mortality rates through 01 July 2020, Black and White incidence rates through 28 May 2020, and Black–White incidence rate gaps on average area-level implicit and explicit racial bias. Across 2994 counties, the average COVID-19 mortality rate (standard deviation) was 1.7/10,000 people (3.3) and average cumulative COVID-19 incidence rate was 52.1/10,000 (77.2). Higher racial bias was associated with higher overall mortality rates (per 1 standard deviation higher implicit bias b = 0.65/10,000 (95% confidence interval: 0.39, 0.91); explicit bias b = 0.49/10,000 (0.27, 0.70)) and higher overall incidence (implicit bias b = 8.42/10,000 (4.64, 12.20); explicit bias b = 8.83/10,000 (5.32, 12.35)). In 957 counties with race-specific data, higher racial bias predicted higher White and Black incidence rates, and larger Black–White incidence rate gaps. Anti-Black bias among Whites predicts worse COVID-19 outcomes and greater inequities. Area-level interventions may ameliorate health inequities.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02464.x
发表时间: 2000-08-01
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Finlay, KA;Stephan, WG
通讯作者: Stephan, WG
DOI: 10.1177/1948550617711229
发表时间: 2018-05-01
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
Hehman, Eric;Flake, Jessica K.;Calanchini, Jimmy
通讯作者: Calanchini, Jimmy
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5
发表时间: 2020-02-15
期刊: LANCET
影响因子: 168.9
作者:
Huang, Chaolin;Wang, Yeming;Cao, Bin
通讯作者: Cao, Bin
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
发表时间: 2003-08-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Greenwald, AG;Nosek, BA;Banaji, MR
通讯作者: Banaji, MR
结构性种族主义,社会危险因素和共同-19-对黑人美国人的危险融合。
DOI: 10.1056/nejmp2023616
发表时间: 2020-09-17
期刊: The New England journal of medicine
影响因子: --
作者:
Egede LE;Walker RJ
通讯作者: Walker RJ