Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism
Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x
复制
发表时间：
2010-09-01
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Archer, Margaret S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Archer, Margaret S.
许多学者继续雅阁日常行为在社会理论中的核心地位，并为布迪厄的惯习的持续相关性辩护。与此同时，大多数人都认识到反身性的重要性。在这篇文章中，我考虑了三个版本的努力，使这些概念兼容，我称之为“经验的组合”，“杂交”，和“本体论和理论的和解。“从分析的角度来看，这些努力最终都没有取得成功。此外，我认为经验的理由，惯习的相关性开始减少到世纪末，在先进的资本主义民主国家的结构的重大变化。在这种情况下，习惯形式证明无法为人们的生活提供指导，因此，使反身性势在必行。最后，我认为，即使是纳塔尔背景的复制今天是一个反射活动，最有利于生产它的模式，我称之为“沟通反射”，变得越来越难以维持。
Many scholars continue to accord routine action a central role in social theory and defend the continuing relevance of Bourdieu's habitus. Simultaneously, most recognize the importance of reflexivity. In this article, I consider three versions of the effort to render these concepts compatible, which I term "empirical combination," "hybridization," and "ontological and theoretical reconciliation." None of the efforts is ultimately successful in analytical terms. Moreover, I argue on empirical grounds that the relevance of habitus began to decrease toward the end of the 20th century, given major changes in the structures of the advanced capitalist democracies. In these circumstances, habitual forms prove incapable of providing guidelines for people's lives and, thus, make reflexivity imperative. I conclude by arguing that even the reproduction of natal background is a reflexive activity today and that the mode most favorable to producing it-what I call "communicative reflexivity"-is becoming harder to sustain.