Household willingness to pay for stream restoration on private and public land: Evidence from the Baltimore metropolitan region

Household willingness to pay for stream restoration on private and public land: Evidence from the Baltimore metropolitan region
复制标题

家庭愿意为私人和公共土地上的河流修复付费:来自巴尔的摩大都市区的证据

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Charles A. Towe
Charles A. Towe
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Rosenberg;D. Newburn;Charles A. Towe

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

河流恢复是缓解城市雨水影响和改善水质的最广泛使用的干预措施之一。政府机构通常将城市河流恢复工作集中在他们已经拥有的公共土地上,即使高度城市化地区的大部分河流英里发生在私人拥有的土地上。然而,有限的研究存在,以区分家庭愿意支付(WTP)发生在私人与公共土地上的河流恢复。在这项研究中,我们使用的选择实验来分析如何家庭支付意愿流恢复属性不同的土地所有权和距离恢复项目。我们的实证研究结果表明,河岸稳定的方法有积极的WTP估计,大大大于那些相关的河岸植被管理清除或植树的幅度。在一般情况下,估计总的家庭支付意愿为公共土地上的四个恢复设计方案是高于相同的恢复设计位于私人土地。尽管如此,私人土地上每个恢复设计方案的估计家庭支付意愿是相当大的,在所有情况下都保留了公共土地上的大部分价值。
Stream restoration is one of the most widely used interventions to mitigate urban stormwater impacts and improve water quality. Government agencies have typically focused urban stream restoration efforts on public lands that they already own, even though a substantial portion of stream miles in highly urbanized areas occur on privately owned land. Yet, limited research exists to distinguish household willingness to pay (WTP) for stream restoration occurring on private versus public land. In this study, we use a choice experiment to analyze how household WTP for stream restoration attributes vary by land ownership and distance to the restoration project. Our empirical results indicate that streambank stabilization approaches have positive WTP estimates that are substantially larger in magnitude than those related to riparian vegetation management for clearing or planting trees. In general, estimated total household WTP for each of the four restoration design scenarios on public land is higher than when the same restoration design is located on private land. Nonetheless, estimated household WTP for each restoration design scenario on private land is substantial, retaining the majority of the value found on public land in all cases.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.003
发表时间: 2006-12-01
影响因子: 7
作者:
Bateman, Ian J.;Day, Brett H.;Lake, Iain
通讯作者: Lake, Iain
河流恢复的环境和经济效益的空间异步性
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac61c6
发表时间: 2022
影响因子: 6.7
作者:
Zhang, Ruoyu;Newburn, David;Rosenberg, Andrew;Lin, Laurence;Groffman, Peter;Duncan, Jonathan;Band, Lawrence
通讯作者: Band, Lawrence