Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments
Systematic review of the outcomes and trade-offs of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments
复制标题
DOI：
10.1038/s41558-020-00971-x
复制
发表时间：
2021-01
影响因子：
30.7
通讯作者：
Cristina Peñasco;L. D. Anadón;Elena Verdolini
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cristina Peñasco;L. D. Anadón;Elena Verdolini
评估用于支持向低碳经济转型的政策工具的技术和社会经济结果的文献既不容易获得，也不具有可比性，而且往往提供相互矛盾的结果。我们制定并实施了一个框架，系统地审查和综合十种脱碳政策工具对七项技术和社会经济成果的影响。我们的系统回顾表明，所选择的监管、经济和金融工具类型通常与对环境、技术和创新成果的积极影响有关。一些工具往往对竞争力和分配结果产生短期负面影响。我们讨论了如何通过设计研发和政府采购、部署政策、碳定价和交易来减少这些权衡或将其转化为共同利益。我们展示了具体的设计特征是如何提高竞争力和减少负面的分配影响的，特别是对小企业而言。在线交互式脱碳政策评估工具允许对证据进行进一步分析。
The literature evaluating the technical and socioeconomic outcomes of policy instruments used to support the transition to low-carbon economies is neither easily accessible nor comparable and often provides conflicting results. We develop and implement a framework to systematically review and synthesize the impact of ten types of decarbonization policy instruments on seven technical and socioeconomic outcomes. Our systematic review shows that the selected types of regulatory and economic and financial instruments are generally associated with positive impacts on environmental, technological and innovation outcomes. Several instruments are often associated with short-term negative impacts on competitiveness and distributional outcomes. We discuss how these trade-offs can be reduced or transformed into co-benefits by designing research and development and government procurement, deployment policies, carbon pricing and trading. We show how specific design features can promote competitiveness and reduce negative distributional impacts, particularly for small firms. An online interactive Decarbonisation Policy Evaluation Tool allows further analysis of the evidence.