A comparison of production-line control mechanisms
A comparison of production-line control mechanisms
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/002075497195713
复制
发表时间：
1997-03
影响因子：
9.2
通讯作者：
Asbjoern M. Bonvik;C. Couch;S. Gershwin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Asbjoern M. Bonvik;C. Couch;S. Gershwin
我们研究的性能的看板，最小阻塞，基本库存，连续，和混合看板连续控制策略，在四台机器的串联生产线，汽车装配线的零件。恒定和变化的需求率的情况下进行研究。主要的业绩衡量标准是服务水平和在制品数量。我们还考虑了其他性能指标，如变异性放大沿着。结果是通过大量的模拟。我们发现，最好的参数选择的混合政策减少库存的10%至20%的最佳看板政策，同时保持相同的服务水平。库存差异随着服务水平需求的增加而增加。基本库存和一致性策略的性能福尔斯看板策略和混合策略之间。CONWIP和混合政策还对需求率的变化做出了更好的反应。
We study the performance of the kanban, minimal blocking, basestock, CONWIP, and hybrid kanban-CONWIP control policies in a four-machine tandem production line making parts for an automobile assembly line. Cases with both constant and changing demand rates are studied. The main performance measures are the service level and the amount of work-in-progress. We also consider other performance measures such as variability amplification along the line. The results are obtained by extensive simulations. We find that the best parameter choices for the hybrid policy decrease inventories by 10% to 20% over the best kanban policy while maintaining the same service levels. The inventory difference grows as the demands on service level increase. The performance of basestock and CONWIP policies falls between those of the kanban and hybrid policies. The CONWIP and hybrid policies also give significantly better response to changes in the demand rate.