Cognitive-behavioral models of emotional writing: A validation study
Cognitive-behavioral models of emotional writing: A validation study
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10608-006-9045-6
复制
发表时间：
2006-06-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Dadds, Mark R.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Guastella, Adam J.;Dadds, Mark R.
以往的研究表明，Pennebaker写作范式可以改善身体和心理健康，然而，不一致的结果表明，它可能不适合在其目前的格式社区传播。这项研究操纵了各组的写作指导，以强调假定的情感过程。三个过程被隔离一致的认知行为模型的创伤：暴露，贬值，和利益发现。论文内容报告，文本分析，痛苦，唤醒，和生理数据表明，分配到不同的写作指令的参与者在写作过程中和之后的方式是一致的，与假定的情绪过程。结果突出了写作范式作为情感处理研究工具的潜力。
Previous research suggests that the Pennebaker writing paradigm may improve physical and psychological health; however, inconsistent findings suggest that it may not be suitable for community dissemination in its current format. This study manipulated writing instructions across groups in order to emphasise putative emotional processes. Three processes were isolated consistent with Cognitive-Behavioral models of trauma: exposure, devaluation, and benefit-finding. Essay content reports, text analysis, distress, arousal, and physiological data demonstrated that participants assigned to different writing instructions responded during and after the writing session in a manner that was consistent with the putative emotion process. The results highlight the potential for the writing paradigm as a research tool for emotional processing.