Exploring the Reasons for Decrease in Binding Affinity of HIV-2 Against HIV-1 Protease Complex Using Interaction Entropy Under Polarized Force Field.
Exploring the Reasons for Decrease in Binding Affinity of HIV-2 Against HIV-1 Protease Complex Using Interaction Entropy Under Polarized Force Field.
复制标题
利用偏振力场下的相互作用熵探讨 HIV-2 与 HIV-1 蛋白酶复合物结合亲和力降低的原因
DOI:
10.3389/fchem.2018.00380
复制
发表时间:
2018
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Duan L
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cong Y;Li Y;Jin K;Zhong S;Zhang JZH;Li H;Duan L
In this study, the differences of binding patterns between two type HIV (HIV-1 and HIV-2) protease and two inhibitors (darunavir and amprenavir) are analyzed and compared using the newly developed interaction entropy (IE) method for the entropy change calculation combined with the polarized force field. The functional role of protonation states in the two HIV-2 complexes is investigated and our study finds that the protonated OD1 atom of Asp25′ in B chain is the optimal choice. Those calculated binding free energies obtained from the polarized force field combined with IE method are significantly consistent with the experimental observed. The bridging water W301 is favorable to the binding of HIV-1 complexes; however, it is unfavorable to the HIV-2 complexes in current study. The volume of pocket, B-factor of Cα atoms and the distance of flap tip in HIV-2 complexes are smaller than that of HIV-1 consistently. These changes may cause localized rearrangement of residues lining their surface and finally result in the different binding mode for the two types HIV. Predicated hot-spot residues (Ala28/Ala28′, Ile50/Ile50′, and Ile84/Ile84′) are nearly same in the four systems. However, the contribution to the free energy of Asp30 residue is more favorable in HIV-1 system than in HIV-2 system. Current study, to some extent, reveals the origin for the decrease in binding affinity of inhibitors against HIV-2 compared with HIV-1 and will provides theoretical guidance for future design of potent dual inhibitors targeting two type HIV protease.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
15
作者:
Duan, Lili;Liu, Xiao;Zhang, John Z. H.
通讯作者:
Zhang, John Z. H.
影响因子:
3
作者:
Brower, Evan T.;Bacha, Usman M.;Freire, Ernesto
通讯作者:
Freire, Ernesto
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Duan, Li L.;Tong, Yan;Zhang, John Z. H.
通讯作者:
Zhang, John Z. H.
影响因子:
6.3
作者:
Genheden S;Ryde U
通讯作者:
Ryde U
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0508452103
发表时间:
2006-01-24
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Hornak, V;Okur, A;Simmerling, C
通讯作者:
Simmerling, C