Is morality policy different? Institutional explanations for post-war Western Europe
Is morality policy different? Institutional explanations for post-war Western Europe
复制标题
道德政策有什么不同吗？
DOI：
10.1080/13501763.2013.761503
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
R. Duval
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Donley T. Studlar;Alessandro Cagossi;R. Duval
虽然越来越多的人认识到西方民主国家的道德政策是一个独特的研究领域，但许多分析在问题和管辖权方面相对狭窄。这一贡献探讨了广泛的经验模式，在18个西欧民主国家自二战以来的五个道德政策问题。分析的问题是堕胎，死刑，安乐死，辅助生殖技术（ART，包括干细胞研究）和同性婚姻。道德政策的两个突出的制度理论，政策类型和两个世界，有助于解释道德政策过程？结果表明，道德政策的过程确实不同于议会政府的通常的，重要的差异被捕获的政党制度的宗教/世俗的分工，这取决于哪些国家被认为是每个类别。
Although there has been increasing recognition that morality policy in Western democracies is a distinctive field of study, many analyses are relatively narrow in issues and jurisdictions. This contribution examines broad empirical patterns for five morality policy issues across 18 West European democracies since World War II. The issues analysed are abortion, capital punishment, euthanasia, assisted reproductive technology (ART, including stem cell research) and same-sex marriage. Which of two prominent institutional theories of morality policy, policy type and two worlds, help explain morality policy processes? The results indicate that morality policy processes do differ from the usual ones of parliamentary government, and that important differences are captured by the religious/secular division of party systems, depending on which countries are considered for each category.