Back to Square One: Revisiting How We Analyse the Right of Access to Environmental Information

Back to Square One: Revisiting How We Analyse the Right of Access to Environmental Information
复制标题

回到第一点:重新审视我们如何分析环境信息获取权

DOI:
10.1093/jel/eqz013
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
1.9
通讯作者:
Whittaker S
Whittaker S
中科院分区:
法学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Whittaker S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

获取环境信息的权利已成为英国当代促进环境治理努力的一个关键方面。这项权利通过《奥胡斯公约》写入国际法,该公约与其他法律发展一起,影响了英国学者对这项权利的分析。对权利进行研究的方式具有重要意义,因为它导致了我们对权利的理解存在差距,并破坏了环境保护努力。本文指出并批判了英国用来分析环境信息获取权的常见分析趋势。文章考虑了其中的两个趋势,考察了它们的负面影响以及《奥胡斯公约》在造成这些趋势方面的作用。文章最后讨论了需要批判性地利用这些知识差距来改进如何保障这一权利,并最终改进环境保护工作的实施。
The right of access to environmental information has become a key aspect of contemporary efforts to promote environmental governance in the UK. The right is enshrined in international law through the Aarhus Convention which, alongside other legal developments, has influenced how academics analyse the right in the UK. How research into the right has been conducted is significant because it has led to gaps in how we understand the right and undermines environmental protection efforts. This article identifies and critiques the common analytical trends used to analyse the right of access to environmental information in the UK. The article considers two of these trends, examining their negative impact and the role of the Aarhus Convention in creating these trends. The article concludes by discussing the need to critically engage with these knowledge gaps to improve how the right is guaranteed and, ultimately, the implementation of environmental protection efforts.
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
C. Reid;M. Lloyd;B. Illsley;Bill Lynch
通讯作者: Bill Lynch
环境信息公共登记册:对其作用的评估
DOI: --
发表时间: 1994
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Andrea Ross;J. Rowan‐Robinson
通讯作者: J. Rowan‐Robinson
DOI: --
发表时间: 2017
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
G. Vigar
通讯作者: G. Vigar
DOI: --
发表时间: --
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Scholar;Solicitor;Berwin Leighton Paisner
通讯作者: Berwin Leighton Paisner
DOI: --
发表时间: 1993
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Gisèle Bakkenist;P. Atherton
通讯作者: P. Atherton