Spoken Discourse Assessment and Analysis in Aphasia: An International Survey of Current Practices.
Spoken Discourse Assessment and Analysis in Aphasia: An International Survey of Current Practices.
复制标题
失语症的口语评估和分析：当前实践的国际调查。
DOI：
10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00708
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Roberts,AngelaC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stark,BrielleC;Dutta,Manaswita;Murray,LauraL;Fromm,Davida;Bryant,Lucy;Harmon,TysonG;Ramage,AmyE;Roberts,AngelaC
目的口语话语分析通常用于失语症患者的评估和治疗，但评估、分析或报告程序没有标准化，从而妨碍了数据的比较/荟萃分析并阻碍了研究结果的重复。重要的第一步是确定当前收集和分析失语症言语的做法。因此，本研究调查了当前的实践，目标是首先在研究环境中标准化口语话语评估，然后在临床环境中实施。方法向全球收集和/或分析失语症口语话语数据的研究人员和临床医生公开了一项混合方法（定量和定性）调查。调查数据收集于 2019 年 9 月至 11 月期间。结果 在同意参与的 201 名个人中，有 189 人完成了调查中的所有强制性问题（完成非强制性回答问题的人较少）。大多数受访者报告了使用话语的障碍，包括转录、编码和分析。最常见的障碍是时间（例如，缺乏时间）。受访者还表示，在评估和治疗失语症患者时，缺乏但需要用于口语言语使用的心理测量特性和规范数据。详细描述了定量和定性结果。结论当前的调查研究评估了失语症的口语话语方法在研究和临床环境中的情况。这项研究的结果将用于指导口语话语过程标准化的发展以及创建心理测量和规范属性数据库。补充材料https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16639510
PurposeSpoken discourse analysis is commonly employed in the assessment and treatment of people living with aphasia, yet there is no standardization in assessment, analysis, or reporting procedures, thereby precluding comparison/meta-analyses of data and hindering replication of findings. An important first step is to identify current practices in collecting and analyzing spoken discourse in aphasia. Thus, this study surveyed current practices, with the goal of working toward standardizing spoken discourse assessment first in research settings with subsequent implementation into clinical settings.MethodA mixed-methods (quantitative and qualitative) survey was publicized to researchers and clinicians around the globe who have collected and/or analyzed spoken discourse data in aphasia. The survey data were collected between September and November 2019.ResultsOf the 201 individuals who consented to participate, 189 completed all mandatory questions in the survey (with fewer completing nonmandatory response questions). The majority of respondents reported barriers to utilizing discourse including transcription, coding, and analysis. The most common barrier was time (e.g., lack of time). Respondents also indicated that there was a lack of, and a need for, psychometric properties and normative data for spoken discourse use in the assessment and treatment of persons with aphasia. Quantitative and qualitative results are described in detail.ConclusionsThe current survey study evaluated spoken discourse methods in aphasia across research and clinical settings. Findings from this study will be used to guide development of process standardization in spoken discourse and for the creation of a psychometric and normative property database.Supplemental Materialhttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16639510