Further information
Further information
复制标题
更多信息
DOI：
10.2307/j.ctv346phg.18
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Anna Krajinska
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anna Krajinska
背景资料：在研究设计、研究实施和科学报告以及一般科学交流中，性别和性别差异往往被忽视。这种疏忽限制了研究结果的普遍性及其对临床实践的适用性，特别是对妇女和男子。本文介绍了一套国际准则，以鼓励更系统的方法来报告跨学科研究中的性别和性别的基本原理。研究方法：一个由代表9个国家的13名专家组成的小组通过一系列电话会议、会议介绍和为期2天的讲习班制定了准则。对716名期刊编辑、科学家和国际出版界的其他成员进行了一项互联网调查，并对科学出版中的性和性别政策进行了文献检索。结果如下：研究中的性和性别平等（SAGER）准则是在研究设计、数据分析、结果和结果解释中报告性和性别信息的综合程序。结论：SAGER准则的主要目的是指导作者准备他们的手稿，但它们也有助于编辑，作为科学的看门人，将性和性别评估纳入所有手稿，作为编辑过程的一个组成部分。
Background: Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines. Methods: A panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the guidelines through a series of teleconferences, conference presentations and a 2-day workshop. An internet survey of 716 journal editors, scientists and other members of the international publishing community was conducted as well as a literature search on sex and gender policies in scientific publishing. Results: The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings. Conclusions: The SAGER guidelines are designed primarily to guide authors in preparing their manuscripts, but they are also useful for editors, as gatekeepers of science, to integrate assessment of sex and gender into all manuscripts as an integral part of the editorial process.
影响因子：
8.4
作者：
Balcombe, Paul;Anderson, Kris;Hawkes, Adam
通讯作者：
Hawkes, Adam