Against Self-Ownership : There Are No Fact-Insensitive Ownership Rights over One's Body
Against Self-Ownership : There Are No Fact-Insensitive Ownership Rights over One's Body
复制标题
反对自我所有权:对自己的身体不存在不顾事实的所有权
DOI：
10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00125.x
复制
发表时间：
2008
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
K. Lippert‐Rasmussen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Lippert‐Rasmussen
自我所有权理论：每个人都享有对自己（他/她的身体和精神）的道德所有权，根据这种观点，人拥有自己的方式就像他们拥有（法律的或道德的）私人所有权一样，也像奴隶主可以拥有（法律的）私人所有权一样。[1]自我所有权理论的核心是一个人对自己的身体和精神的使用的道德控制权。对自己的完全所有权所包括的其他权利包括：如果某人未经许可使用自己的身体或精神，则有权获得赔偿;防止侵犯自己的自我所有权;如果某人以侵犯自己的自我所有权的方式使用自己，则有权获得赔偿;将自己的权利转让给他人（例如，通过销售），并豁免非自愿丧失自我所有权。[2]显然，自我所有权对个人可以做的事情施加了道德约束。沃伦·奎因这样说：“一个人是
The Self-Ownership Thesis: Each person enjoys moral ownership of himself or herself (his/her body and mind).On this view, persons own themselves in the same way that they have (legal or moral) private ownership of things and in the same way that a slaveholder can have (legal) private ownership of a complete chattel slave. 1 At the core of the self-ownership thesis is the moral control-right a person has over the use of his or her body and mind. Other rights included in full ownership over oneself include the right to compensation if someone uses one's body or mind without permission, the right to prevent violation of one's self-ownership, the right to recover compensation if someone uses one in a way that violates one's self-ownership, the right to transfer one's rights over oneself to others (eg, by way of sale), and immunity from nonconsensual loss of one's self-ownership. 2 Clearly, self-ownership places moral constraints on what can be done permissibly to individuals. Warren Quinn puts it thus:" A person is