Variation in the biological half-life of methylmercury in humans: Methods, measurements and meaning.
Variation in the biological half-life of methylmercury in humans: Methods, measurements and meaning.
复制标题
人类甲基汞生物半衰期的变化:方法、测量和意义。
DOI:
10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.02.003
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Caito,SamuelW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rand,MatthewD;Caito,SamuelW
BackgroundUnderstanding methylmercury (MeHg) toxicity requires a complete understanding of its fundamental toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic characteristics in the human body. The biological half-life (t1/2) of MeHg is a kinetic property that directly influences the body burden of Hg that results from repeated exposures such as can occur with fish and seafood consumption. The t1/2of MeHg in humans is approximately 50 days, equivalent to an elimination rate (kel) of 0.014 day−1. However, numerous studies report a wide range of half-life values (t1/2< 30 to >120 days), demonstrating that significant variation in the biological process of MeHg elimination exists. This variation is a source of considerable uncertainty in deriving a meaningful reference dose for MeHg applicable to all individuals in a population.Scope of reviewFirst, we summarize fundamentals of MeHg toxicokinetics, emphasizing the central role that biological half-life plays in MeHg dosimetry. We next present important considerations for how kinetic analyses are performed. We provide an example of how MeHg half-life variation directly influences the body burden and, in certain contexts, can result in MeHg levels exceeding the US EPA Reference Dose. We then survey existing studies that report MeHg half-life determinations in people.Major conclusionsRecent advances in methods of determining MeHg kinetics in people have made individualized assessment of MeHg elimination rates more accurate and readily obtainable.General significanceCharacterization of MeHg half-life, particularly in vulnerable individuals, such as pregnant women and children, will diminish the remaining toxicokinetic uncertainty surrounding MeHg exposures and will better inform the risk assessment process.