Differences in crystal properties and ligand affinities of an antifluorescyl Fab (4-4-20) in two solvent systems.
Differences in crystal properties and ligand affinities of an antifluorescyl Fab (4-4-20) in two solvent systems.
复制标题
抗荧光基 Fab (4-4-20) 在两种溶剂系统中的晶体性质和配体亲和力的差异。
DOI:
10.1002/prot.340030304
复制
发表时间:
1988
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Edmundson,AB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gibson,AL;Herron,JN;He,XM;Patrick,VA;Mason,ML;Lin,JN;Kranz,DM;VossJr,EW;Edmundson,AB
An antigen‐binding fragment (Fab) from a murine monoclonal antibody (4‐4‐20) with high affinity for fluorescein was cocrystallized with ligand in polyethylene glycol (PEG) and 2‐methl‐2,4‐pentanediol (MPD) in forms suitable for X‐ray analyses. In MPD the affinity of the intact antibody for fluorescein was 300 times lower than the value (3.4 × 1010M−1) obtained in aqueous buffers. This decreased affinity was manifested by the partial release of bound fluorescein when MPD was added to solutions of liganded Feb during crystallization trials, In PEG, the ligand remained firmly bound to the protein. The liganded Feb crystallized in the monoclinic space groupP21in PEG, witha= 58.6,b= 97.2,c= 44.5 Å and β = 95.2°. In MPD the space group was triclinicP1, witha= 58.3,b= 43.4,c= 42.3 Å, α = 83.9°, β = 87.6°, and γ = 84.5°. X‐ray diffraction data were collected for both forms to 2.5‐Å resolution. Surprisingly, the triclinic form of the liganed antifluorescyl Feb had the same space group, closely similar cell dimensions, and practically the same orientation in the unit cell as an unliganded Fab (BV04‐01) with activity against single‐stranded DNA.