Subsidizing Charitable Giving with Rebates or Matching: Further Laboratory Evidence
Subsidizing Charitable Giving with Rebates or Matching: Further Laboratory Evidence
复制标题
通过回扣或配捐补贴慈善捐赠：进一步的实验室证据
DOI：
10.2307/20111853
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Grossman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Catherine C. Eckel;P. Grossman
我们研究了两种不同的方式来补贴慈善捐赠：通过回扣（将部分捐赠返还给捐赠者）或通过匹配（在捐赠者的捐赠中添加额外的捐赠）。在之前的实验研究中，我们已经表明，参与者在比赛中比在同等回扣下向慈善事业捐赠更多。之前的受试者内实验设计要求参与者在两种类型的补贴下做出一系列决定。每个决定都包括在受试者和受试者从指定列表中选择的慈善机构之间分配捐赠。本文研究了该结果是否是先前受试者内部设计的产物：受试者可能未能完全区分这两种类型的补贴。在本文中，我们报告了受试者间设计的结果，其中参与者只需要做出一种类型的决定——涉及回扣或涉及匹配补贴。我们的结果证实了之前的发现。
We examine two different ways to subsidize charitable giving: by a rebate (returning a portion of the donation to the giver) or by a match (adding additional donations to the giver's donation). In previous experimental research, we have shown that participants give more to charity under the match than under an equivalent rebate. The previous within-subject experimental design required participants to make a series of decisions under both types of subsidy. Each decision consisted of an allocation of an endowment between the subject and a charity chosen by the subject from a specified list. This article examines whether that result is an artifact of the previous within-subjects design: subjects may have failed to fully distinguish the two types of subsidy. In the current article, we report results from a between-subjects design, where participants are required to make only one type of decision—involving rebates or involving matching subsidies. Our results confirm previous findings.