Do women with greater trait body dissatisfaction experience body dissatisfaction states differently? An experience sampling study

Do women with greater trait body dissatisfaction experience body dissatisfaction states differently? An experience sampling study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.01.004
复制
发表时间:
2018-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
5.2
通讯作者:
Krug, Isabel
Krug, Isabel
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew;Richardson, Ben;Krug, Isabel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究评估了状态身体不满意体验的关键特征--惰性、时刻的不稳定性和跨时间点的平均水平--与特质身体不满意和/或饮食失调风险的关系。参与者包括161名女性,她们完成了身体特质不满和饮食失调病理的测量,然后在7天内每天6次完成报告的身体不满状态和背景影响(暴饮暴食、饮食限制、锻炼和外表比较行为)。结果表明,特质身体不满意的个体与身体形象更健康的个体在平均状态身体不满意评分方面存在可靠的差异,但惰性或不稳定的评分没有差异。状态平均和特质身体不满意唯一地预测进食病理,尽管它们对临床干酪性的预测准确度是相似的。讨论了使用状态身体图像数据来理解特征身体图像和饮食病理的成本与收益。(C)2018爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
The present study evaluated the relation of key features of state body dissatisfaction experiences - inertia, instability from moment-to-moment, and average level across time-points - to trait body dissatisfaction and/or eating disorder risk. Participants included 161 women who completed measures of trait body dissatisfaction and disordered eating pathology, and then completed reported state body dissatisfaction and contextual influences (binge eating, dietary restraint, exercise, and appearance comparison behaviors) 6 times daily for 7 days. Results indicated that individuals with elevated trait body dissatisfaction were reliably different from those with healthier body image in terms of average state body dissatisfaction ratings, but not for inertia or instability. State mean and trait body dissatisfaction uniquely predicted eating pathology, although their predictive accuracy for clinical caseness was comparable. Cost vs. benefit of using state body image data for understanding trait body image and eating pathology is discussed. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.