Earthing the Laboratory Speculations for doctoral training
Earthing the Laboratory Speculations for doctoral training
复制标题
接地实验室对博士培训的猜测
DOI：
10.1080/13528165.2020.1909896
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
0.1
通讯作者：
Spatz B
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Spatz B
在所有关于戏剧和表演研究培训的讨论中，对未来研究人员培训方式的关注相对较少。在这篇文章中，我首先提出的前提是，对于绩效研究来说，最关键的培训领域是博士学位，这对理论研究和转型至关重要。本文从艺术研究及其去殖民潜力的角度，对戏剧与表演专业博士学位课程的形式与结构进行了重新思考。我们在这些项目中培训了什么？博士课程的形式可能如何应对学术界日益加剧的新自由主义、全球日益增长的数字网络以及要求社会和生态正义的自由和激进运动日益增长的压力？将博士课程重新想象为乌托邦或异托邦空间的可能性有哪些？博士学位本身会成为改变戏剧和表演研究的学科、人文学科的实践，甚至大学本身作为一个社会认知机构的杠杆吗？根据当代的实践研究辩论、社会认识论和本土的根植的规范性理论，它认为我们还没有开始想象什么是艺术博士学位。
For all the discussion of training in theatre and performance studies, relatively little attention has been paid to the ways in which future researchers are trained. In this essay I begin from the premise that, for performance studies, the arena of training most crucial to theorize and transform is that of the doctorate. This essay reconsiders the form and structure of PhD programmes in theatre and performance from the perspective of artistic research and its decolonial potential. What are we training in these programmes? How might the form of the PhD programme respond to the intensifying neoliberalization of academia, the increasing digital networking of the globe and the growing pressure of liberal and radical movements for social and ecological justice? What possibilities exist for reimagining the doctoral programme as a utopian or heterotopian space? Could the doctorate itself become a leverage point from which to shift the discipline of theatre and performance studies, the practice of the humanities, and even the university itself as a social-epistemic institution? Drawing on contemporary practice research debates, social epistemology, and indigenous theories of grounded normativity, it argues that we have not yet begun to imagine what an artistic doctorate could be.