Reconciling Approaches in the Study of Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
Reconciling Approaches in the Study of Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
复制标题
混合成员选举制度研究中的协调方法
DOI：
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190258658.013.13
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Misa
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Herron;Erik S.;Nemoto;Kuniaki;and Nishikawa;Misa
过去三十年来混合成员选举制度的扩散引起了学术界对其后果的广泛关注。一种被称为“受控比较”的方法强调两种不同选举规则的并置如何使学者能够评估杜韦尔热命题的含义。另一种方法，称为污染效应，强调同时使用两种不同的选举规则如何产生相互作用，从而可能破坏杜韦尔热命题的含义。基于这两种方法的文献尚无定论。一些研究发现了污染影响的证据，而另一些研究则没有。本章致力于协调这两种方法，并提出一个研究议程，该议程可以揭示为什么混合成员系统的学术研究尚未就其后果达成共识。
The diffusion of mixed-member electoral systems over the last three decades has prompted extensive scholarly attention to their consequences. One approach, labeled controlled comparison, emphasizes how the juxtaposition of two different election rules allows scholars to assess the implications of Duverger’s propositions. Another approach, labeled contamination effects, emphasizes how the simultaneous use of two different election rules creates interaction that potentially undermines the implications of Duverger’s propositions. The literature building upon these two approaches is inconclusive; some research finds evidence of contamination effects and other research does not. This chapter strives to reconcile the two approaches and proposes a research agenda that could uncover why scholarship on mixed-member systems has not reached consensus on their consequences.