Coping in context: sociocultural determinants of responses to sexual harassment.

Coping in context: sociocultural determinants of responses to sexual harassment.
复制标题

在具体情况下应对:应对性骚扰的社会文化决定因素。

DOI:
10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.394
复制
发表时间:
2002
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
Cortina,LiliaM
Cortina,LiliaM
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wasti,SArzu;Cortina,LiliaM

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

作者调查了来自3种文化和2个职业阶层的4个职业女性样本对性骚扰的应对反应。完整链接聚类分析为DE Knapp、RH Faley、SE Ekeberg和CLZ Dubois(1997)的应对框架提供了初步支持,表明回避、否认、谈判、寻求支持和社会应对是对性骚扰的普遍反应。此外,LF Fitzgerald(1990)的内部-外部二分法似乎捕捉到了应对反应之间更高层次的关系。此外,回归分析表明,土耳其裔和西班牙裔美国女性比英美裔美国女性更倾向于回避,而西班牙裔美国女性也更倾向于否认,但较少寻求支持。在社会应对方面没有出现差异。作者在应对理论、个人主义-集体主义、权力距离和父权性别规范的背景下讨论了这些结果。
The authors investigated coping responses to sexual harassment across 4 samples of working women from 3 cultures and 2 occupational classes. Complete-link cluster analyses provide preliminary support for DE Knapp, RH Faley, SE Ekeberg, and CLZ Dubois's (1997) coping framework, suggesting that avoidance, denial, negotiation, advocacy seeking, and social coping are universal responses to sexual harassment. Further, LF Fitzgerald's (1990) internal-external dichotomy appears to capture higher order relationships among coping responses. In addition, regression analyses suggest that Turkish and Hispanic American women engage in more avoidance than Anglo American women, and Hispanic women also use more denial but less advocacy seeking. No differences emerged in social coping. The authors discuss these results in the context of coping theory, individualism-collectivism, power distance, and patriarchal gender norms.