Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women

Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00198-006-0106-1
复制
发表时间:
2006-07-01
影响因子:
4
通讯作者:
Eastell, R.
Eastell, R.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Melton, L. J., III;Wenger, D. E.;Eastell, R.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

引言:识别脊椎骨折的方法仍然存在争议。方法:对512名绝经后妇女的年龄分层人群样本进行了长达12年(4455人-年)的连续X线片随访。结果如下:在本研究期间,112名女性发生新发椎骨骨折(任何椎骨高度较基线降低20%),年年龄校正(2000年美国白色>= 50岁女性)发生率为23/1000。根据使用的形态学定义,基线时椎体畸形的患病率范围为3%至90%。最近一种标准化椎体高度的方法与X线片的定性临床阅读最一致[kappa(kappa),0.53]。几乎所有不同的基线定义都预测了未来的椎骨骨折,但大多数预测能力都归因于严重的(例如,4 SD)畸形包括在更慷慨的(例如,3 SD)分类。尽管宽松的定义更敏感,限制性的定义更具体,但通过c指数(类似于ROC曲线下面积)评估,它们预测新椎体骨折的总体能力大致相当。结论:这一结果表明,形态测量学定义的选择取决于特定的应用,特别是取决于是否更重要的是最大限度地提高灵敏度或特异性。
Introduction: Approaches for recognizing vertebral fractures remain controversial. Methods: An age-stratified population sample of 512 postmenopausal women was followed with serial radiographs for up to 12 years (4455 person-years). Results: 112 women experienced a new vertebral fracture (20% reduction in any vertebral height from baseline) within this study period, for an annual age-adjusted (to US white women >= 50 years of age in 2000) incidence of 23 per 1000. Depending on the morphometric definition used, the prevalence of vertebral deformities at baseline ranged from 3 to 90%. A recent method to standardize vertebral heights produced the best agreement with a qualitative clinical reading of the films [kappa (kappa), 0.53]. Almost all of the different baseline definitions predicted future vertebral fractures, but most of the predictive power was attributable to the severe (e.g., 4 SD) deformities included within more generous (e.g., 3 SD) classifications. Whereas the generous definitions were more sensitive, and the restrictive ones more specific, their overall abilities to predict a new vertebral fracture were roughly comparable as evaluated by the c-index (analogous to the area under an ROC curve). Conclusions: This result suggests that the choice of a morphometry definition depends on the particular application and, in particular, on whether it is more important to maximize sensitivity or specificity.