Assessment of professionalism: From where have we come - to where are we going? An update from the Ottawa Consensus Group on the assessment of professionalism

Assessment of professionalism: From where have we come - to where are we going? An update from the Ottawa Consensus Group on the assessment of professionalism
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/0142159x.2018.1543862
复制
发表时间:
2019-03-04
期刊:
影响因子:
4.7
通讯作者:
Wade, Winnie
Wade, Winnie
中科院分区:
教育学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hodges, Brian;Paul, Robert;Wade, Winnie

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:2009年,专业评估国际工作组(IWG)开始合作,并于2011年发布了建议。近十年后,工作组再次召开会议,评估专业精神的实践和研究状况以及2011年报告的影响。方法:一项文献计量学研究确定了自2011年以来所有关于专业评估的出版物,并注意到那些引用了原始报告的出版物。文章被编码,以确定引用的原因和评估的新趋势。在重要的国际教育会议上举行的讨论小组补充了文献计量学数据。结果:2011年以来b谷歌Scholar和Web of Science分别收录了600篇和164篇专业评估论文,其中分别有177篇(30%)和84篇(50%)引用了IWG的原论文。英语出版物最常见(83%),但也有来自40个国家的作者用13种其他语言发表的文章。该报告通常被引用来证明对专业主义的普遍关注(41%),对专业主义的评估(38%)以及探索不同国家和职业的专业主义(25%)。一项专题分析表明,在2011年推荐的9个研究领域中,9个类别中有7个类别的跨语言和文化研究大幅增加。结论:尽管专业精神的评估仍然是一个挑战,但研究基础仍在继续增长,特别是与跨文化和语言的专业精神相关的研究,而且很大比例的出版物引用了IWG的建议。关于患者观点的研究和写作仍然存在差距。
Background: In 2009, an International Working Group (IWG) on the Assessment of Professionalism began collaborating and published recommendations in 2011. Nearly a decade later the IWG reconvened to take stock of the state of practice and research in professionalism and the impact of the 2011 report. Method: A bibliometric study identified all publications on assessment of professionalism since 2011, noting those that cited the original report. Articles were coded to identify the reason for citation and new trends in assessment. Bibliometric data were supplemented by discussion groups held at key international education meetings. Results: Six-hundred publications on the assessment of professionalism were found in Google Scholar and 164 in Web of Science since 2011, of which 177 (30%) and 84 (50%) respectively cited the original IWG publication. English language publications were most common (83%), but there were articles in 13 other languages by authors from 40 countries. The report was cited commonly to justify attention to professionalism in general (41%), assessment of professionalism (38%) and to explore professionalism in different countries and professions (25%). A thematic analysis showed that of 9 research areas recommended in 2011, 7 of 9 categories were represented with a large increase in research across languages and cultures. Conclusions: Though the assessment of professionalism remains a challenge the research base continues to grow, especially related to professionalism across cultures and languages, and a large percentage of publications cite the IWG recommendations. There remains a gap in research and writing about patients' perspectives.