Influence of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism on whole-blood folate concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS, microbiologic assay, and bio-rad radioassay

Influence of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism on whole-blood folate concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS, microbiologic assay, and bio-rad radioassay
复制标题

DOI:
10.1373/clinchem.2007.096545
复制
发表时间:
2008-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
9.3
通讯作者:
Koontz, Deborah
Koontz, Deborah
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fazili, Zia;Pfeiffer, Christine M.;Koontz, Deborah

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景技术背景:5,10-亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶(NADPH)(MTHFR)C677 T多态性可能影响液相色谱-串联质谱法测定的全血叶酸模式(LC-MS/MS)和通过LC-MS/MS、微生物测定和Bio-Rad放射性测定(BR)测量总叶酸。方法:我们用这三种方法分析了2个血库的171份全血溶血产物的叶酸模式和总叶酸浓度,并确定了MTHFR基因型。在美国组中,通过LC-MS/MS测定的中位(范围)总叶酸浓度[378(228-820)nmol/L; n=96]高于欧洲组[250(122582)nmol/L; n=75]。C/C(n=73)和C/T(n=66)基因型个体的全血叶酸模式[中位数(范围)]相似:分别为88%(71%-91%)和86%(50%-91%),5-甲基四氢叶酸(5CH(3)THF)的含量为12%(9%-29%),而5-甲基四氢叶酸以外的形式(非5CH(3)THF)的含量为14%(9%-51%)。T/T(n=32)基因型个体5CH 3 THF阳性率为58%(22%-87%),非5CH(3)THF阳性率为42%(13%-78%)。与微生物测定结果相比,LC-MS/MS(r=0.94)和BR(r=0.87)结果显著较低(分别为-10%和-45%);然而,BR测定的这些差异具有浓度依赖性和基因型依赖性(C/C+C/T为-48%,T/T为-31%)。除四氢叶酸(THF)[46.4%(8.1%)]外,微生物学试验完全回收了添加至全血溶血产物中的叶酸[平均值(SD)]。BR法对5CH(3)THF回收率不足[51%(4.1%)]和5-甲酰四氢叶酸回收率不足[18%(0.1%)],对THF回收率过高[152%(19%)]。LC-MS/MS法和微生物法测定的总叶酸之间的一致性,与MTHFR基因型无关,允许使用一个回归方程。由于BR结果是基因型依赖性的,因此应使用不同的回归方程。
BACKGROUND: The 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (NADPH) (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism may affect whole-blood folate pattern measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and total folate measured by LC-MS/MS, microbiologic assay, and Bio-Rad radioassay (BR).METHODS: We analyzed 171 whole blood hemolysates from 2 blood banks for folate pattern and total folate concentrations using these 3 methods and determined MTHFR genotype.RESULTS: The median (range) total folate concentration by LC-MS/MS was higher in the US set [378 (228-820) nmol/L; n=96] than in the European set [250 (122582) nmol/L; n=75]. The whole-blood folate pattern [median (range)] was similar for individuals with C/C (n=73) and C/T (n=66) genotype: 88% (71%-91%) and 86% (50%-91%), respectively, for 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (5CH(3)THF) vs 12% (9%-29%) and 14% (9%-51%) for forms other than 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid (non-5CH(3)THF). Individuals with T/T (n=32) genotype had 58% (22%-87%) 5CH3THF vs 42% (13%-78%) non-5CH(3)THF. Compared with microbiologic assay results, LC-MS/MS (r=0.94) and BR (r=0.87) results were significantly lower (-10% and -45%, respectively); however, these differences were concentration dependent and also genotype dependent for the BR assay (-48% for C/C+C/T and -31% for T/T). The microbiologic assay completely recovered [mean (SD)] folates added to a whole blood hemolysate, except for tetrahydrofolic acid (THF) [46.4% (8.1%)]. The BR assay underrecovered 5CH(3)THF [51% (4.1%)] and 5-formyltetrahydrofolic acid [18% (0.1%)], and overrecovered THF [152% (19%)].CONCLUSION: MTHFR C677T polymorphism influences the folate pattern in whole blood. The agreement between total folate by LC-MS/MS and microbiologic assay, independent of the MTHFR genotype, allows the use of one regression equation. Because BR results are genotype dependent, different regression equations should be used.