A polymer—microemulsion interaction: The coacervation model
A polymer—microemulsion interaction: The coacervation model
复制标题
聚合物-微乳液相互作用:凝聚模型
DOI:
10.1016/0021-9797(82)90304-6
复制
发表时间:
1982
影响因子:
8.6
通讯作者:
J. Bock
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Siano;J. Bock
A model which successfully predicts many of the qualitative features of the phase separation can be based upon the assumption that the microemulsion particle retains its integrity when diluted with external phase or when mixed with a polymer (which does not complex with the surfactants). In this case, the microemulsion particle behaves thermodynamically in a manner similar to a macromolecule so that one can predict that the polymer—microemulsion phase diagram will have qualitative similarities to that exhibited by the polymer—polymer2-solvent case. Most of the experiments were conducted by following the phase boundaries by measurements of the cloud points of the polymermicroemulsion mixtures. The cloud points of the mixtures were found to be (usually) linear functions of the weight fraction of the added polymer and decreased with increasing molecular weight. Plots of the logarithm of the slopes of these curves against the logarithm of the polymer molecular weight were linear, with a slope designated as β. The values for β for twenty-five systems studied fell within the narrow range of 0.55 ± 0.15. These values were seen to be the same as the Mark—Houwink exponents in the relationship between the intrinsic viscosity and the polymer molecular weight. The reason for this correspondence appears to be that the coacervation occurs at a polymer concentration about equal to the threshold overlap concentration. Ternary phase diagrams with microemulsion particles, brine, and polymer selected as pseudocomponents also exhibit many of the features predicted by the model. The phase boundary asymmetry is in the direction expected and asymptotes with the expected independence upon microemulsion and polymer molecular weights are also demonstrated. In agreement with the model, it is shown that the controlling variable is polymer weight average, rather thanzor number average molecular weight.