Political Autonomy and Divided Societies
Political Autonomy and Divided Societies
复制标题
政治自治和分裂的社会
DOI:
10.1057/9780230365322_2
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Keating M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Keating M
Strategies for accommodating national diversity range along a spectrum from assimilation to separation, but in recent years there has been a growing, albeit not universal, consensus on the desirability and legitimacy of limited self-government within the state and broader supranational and transnational orders. If nationality claims are couched in absolute terms, seen as irreducible rights, then such strategies are futile, and have been criticized as merely stoking the demand. There is, however, an important strand of thinking that sees them rather as demands, to be treated as normal forms of politics amenable to compromise and brokerage.The demand for autonomy is linked to, but not reducible to, the attainment of substantive policy goals across a range of domains. One of these is culture, which may be a matter of language, of shared values or traditional ways of life. Another is economic, where there is a perception that a community is exploited or disadvantaged. This could be a poor community that is marginalized within existing state and market structures, or a wealthy one that is held back from doing even better. Welfare and social policy provide another, increasingly important, source of division, where the predominant forces in one community share a more collectivist vision of society, while another inclines more to individualism and neo-liberalism. This is, of course, linked to the previous one in that there is increasing concern about interterritorial and intercommunity inequality, as well as the traditional concern with interpersonal inequality. Another demand is more directly political, where there is a desire to reset the boundaries of the political community. This may be because a group is systematically outvoted, providing