Who is indigenous? ‘Peoplehood’ and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating indigenous identity
Who is indigenous? ‘Peoplehood’ and ethnonationalist approaches to rearticulating indigenous identity
复制标题
谁是土著？“民族”和民族主义方法重新阐明土著身份
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jeff J. Corntassel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jeff J. Corntassel
在全球论坛上，关于为土著人民确立定义标准与土著人民自我认同的无限权利的辩论，暴露了在国际法标准制定方面的某种困境。要求严格的定义标准将一些土著群体排除在他们所需要的保护之外，同时使他们的身份具体化。然而，由于未能对土著人民确立一个公认的定义，东道国对将国际法律的文书适用于世界土著人民感到关切。在调查了民族主义/国际法领域的学者以及政府间组织和非政府组织的从业人员提出的土著定义之后，确定在土著人民的自我认同和确立一个可行的定义之间取得平衡是可能的。本文利用霍尔姆、皮尔逊和查维斯（2003年）改进的“人”的模式，提出了一个灵活而动态的新的土著人民工作定义。
Debate within global forums over establishing definitional standards for indigenous peoples versus an unlimited right of indigenous self-identification has exposed something of a dilemma over standard setting in international law. Requiring strict, definitional standards excludes some indigenous groups from the very protections they need, while reifying their identities. Yet failure to establish an accepted deflnition of indigenous peoples leads to host-state concerns over applying international legal instruments to the world's indigenous populations. After surveying indigenous definitions developed by academicians in the fleld of nationalism/international law as well as practitioners from IGOs and NGOs, it is determined that a balance between self-identiflcation and establishing a working definition of indigenous peoples is possible. Utilizing a model of ‘Peoplehood’ refined by Holm, Pearson and Chavis (2003), the article presents a new working deflnition of indigenous peoples that is both flexible and dynamic.