THE STUDY OF THE MODEL INTERVAL TIME IN 400M HURDLE RACE FOR MEN
THE STUDY OF THE MODEL INTERVAL TIME IN 400M HURDLE RACE FOR MEN
复制标题
男子400M跨栏比赛间歇时间模型研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1996
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Y. Ogura
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Yasui;K. Aoyama;K. Ogiso;K. Asaba;Y. Ogura
本研究的目的是计算和评价男子400米跨栏模型间隔时间方程。样本总数为651个。间隔时间定义为从起点到跨栏后第一次触地的时间，以及此后每次触地之间的时间。根据表现时间将样本分为8组。成绩范围为48.79- 59.45秒。从样本中计算出每组11个方程。结果各间隔时间与表现时间高度相关。其中，第8个I和第1个I与生产性能的相关系数最高。A组表现时间与第2 ~ 9次间隔时间相关（48.48 ~ 50.99,n=41）。B组表现时间与第2、3、5次间歇时间相关（51.1 3 ~ 51.97,n=55）。C组表现时间与5 ~ 8次间歇时间相关（52.00 ~ 52.99,n= 1.14）。D组表现时间与第3、8 ~ 10次间隔时间相关（53.00 ~ 53.99,n=143）。E组表现时间与5 ~ 8次间歇时间相关（54.00 ~ 54.98,n=126）。F组表现时间与6 ~ 8次间歇时间相关（55.00 ~ 55.99,n=82）。G组表现时间与7 ~ 8次间歇时间相关（56.02 ~ 56.94,n=32）。H组表现时间与8 ~ 10次间隔时间相关（57.08 ~ 59.45,n=48）。结论7组（A、C、D、E、F、G、H）的表现时间与第8次间歇时间显著相关。此外，5组的演奏时间与第7、9音程相关。因此，建议表现与比赛后半段，特别是第8间歇高度相关。综上所述，为了提高整体表现，提高第7音程和第9音程之间的表现是很重要的。参考文献1)M1YASHITA: 11米跨栏模型触地时间的研究：第14期，第20期，1993;2)盛田正敏，IGARASHI kouichi：世界顶级跨栏比赛的案例研究。1991年东京田径世锦赛：第11届世界田径锦标赛，第11期，第2-13期，1992
Introduction The purpose of this study was to calculate and evaluate the equations for the model interval time of 400m hurdle race for men. The total number of samples were 651. Interval time was defined as the time from starting point to the first touchdown after hurdling, and between each touchdown there-after. The samples were divided into 8 groups according to performance time. The performance range were 48.79- 59.45sec. 11 equations for each group were calculated from the samples. RESULTS High correlation between each interval time and performance time was obtained. the correlation coefficient between 8th i n t e r v a l t i m e and performance was the highest in particular. Performance time correlated with the 2-9th interval time in group A (48.48- 50.99,n=41). Performance time correlated with the 2,3,5th interval time in group B (51.1 3- 51.97,n=55). Performance time correlated with the 5-8th interval time in group C (52.00- 52.99,n=I 14). Performance time correlated with the 3th,8-10th interval time in group D(53.00 -53.99,n=143). Performance time correlated with the 5-8th interval time in group E (54.00- 54.98,n=126). Performance time correlated with the 6-8th interval time in group F (55.00- 55.99,n=82). Performance time correlated with the 7-8th interval time in group G (56.02- 56.94,n=32). Performance time correlated with the 8-10th interval time in group H (57.08-59.45,n=48). CONCLUSION The performance time correlated significantly with the 8th interval time in 7 groups(A,C,D,E,F,G,H). Furthermore performance time corelated with the 7th and 9th interval in 5 groups. Therefore, it is suggested that performance correlates highly with the latter half of race, especially the 8th interval. In conclusion, in order to improve overall performance, it is important to improve the performance between the 7th and the 9th interval. REFERENCES 1)Ken M1YASHITA:The study of model touchdown time for 11 Om hurdle race: RESERCH QUATERLY FOR ATHLETICS, 14,pplO-20,1993 2)Masatoshi MORITA, kouichi IGARASHI :The case study on the race of top hurdler in the world-The Ill WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS IN ATHLETICS TOKYO 1991 -: RESERCH QUATERLY FOR ATHLETICS,ll ,pp2-13,1992