Relationship between hypnosis and personality trait in participants with high or low hypnotic susceptibility.

Relationship between hypnosis and personality trait in participants with high or low hypnotic susceptibility.
复制标题

高或低催眠敏感性参与者的催眠与人格特质的关系

DOI:
10.2147/ndt.s134930
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Wang W
Wang W
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zhang Y;Wang Y;Shen C;Ye Y;Shen S;Zhang B;Wang J;Chen W;Wang W

文献摘要

相似文献

背景正常人格与催眠易感性之间的关系对于理解心理加工和精神障碍非常重要,但在正常人或精神障碍患者中,这种关系不太一致。我们假设这种相关性是存在的,但在不同催眠水平的个体中是不同的。参与者和方法我们邀请了72名高(高组)和47名低(低组)催眠易感性的人进行测试NEO-PI-R和斯坦福大学催眠易感性量表,C型(SHSSC)。结果高水平组在经验开放性和感受开放性方面的得分显著高于低水平组。在低组中,SHSSC总的积极预测开放的想法;年龄回归积极预测开放的经验和消极预测外向性;氨嗅觉缺失的宜人性负向预测;和负性幻视积极预测开放的经验。在HIGH组中,幻觉声音被经验开放性正向预测,被宜人性负向预测,催眠后遗忘被外倾性正向预测,被经验开放性负向预测。结论正常人格特质与催眠敏感性项目之间的相关性较弱,且在两组中存在差异,提示心理或躯体形式障碍的治疗可能通过调节催眠敏感性和调动人格功能来实现。
Background The relationship between normal personality and hypnotic susceptibility is important for understanding mental processing and mental disorders, but it is less consistent in normal people or in patients with a psychiatric disorder. We have hypothesized that the correlation exists but varies in individuals with different levels of hypnotizability. Participants and methods We invited 72 individuals with high (HIGH group) and 47 individuals with low (LOW group) hypnotic susceptibilities to undertake tests of NEO-PI-R and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSSC). Results The HIGH group scored significantly higher than the LOW group did on openness to experience and its facet openness to feelings. In the LOW group, SHSSC total was positively predicted by openness to ideas; age regression was positively predicted by openness to experience and negatively predicted by extraversion; anosmia to ammonia was negatively predicted by agreeableness; and negative visual hallucination was positively predicted by openness to experience. In the HIGH group, hallucinated voice was positively predicted by openness to experience and negatively predicted by agreeableness, and posthypnotic amnesia was positively predicted by extraversion and negatively predicted by openness to experience. Conclusion The associations between normal personality traits and hypnotic susceptibility items were weak and different in the two groups, which imply that managing mental or somatoform disorders might be through adjusting hypnotizability and mobilizing personality functions.