Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial
Does Tweeting Improve Citations? One-Year Results From the TSSMN Prospective Randomized Trial
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.065
复制
发表时间：
2021-01-01
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Antonoff, Mara B.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Luc, Jessica G. Y.;Archer, Michael A.;Antonoff, Mara B.
背景。胸外科社交媒体网络（TSSMN）是心胸外科领先期刊通过社交媒体突出出版物的合作成果。本研究旨在评估一项前瞻性随机社交媒体试验的1年结果，以确定推特对后续引用和非传统文献计量学的影响。将112篇具有代表性的原创文章按1:1的比例随机分为TSSMN推文组和对照组（未推文组）。测量的终点包括1年内与基线相比的引用次数，以及文章级指标（Altmetric评分）和Twitter分析。通过单变量和多变量回归分析确定了引文的独立预测因子。与对照文章相比，推文文章的Altmetric得分显著提高(推文9.4 +/- 5.8 vs非推文1.0 +/- 1.8，P
Background. The Thoracic Surgery Social Media Network (TSSMN) is a collaborative effort of leading journals in cardiothoracic surgery to highlight publications via social media. This study aims to evaluate the 1-year results of a prospective randomized social media trial to determine the effect of tweeting on subsequent citations and nontraditional bibliometrics.Methods. A total of 112 representative original articles were randomized 1:1 to be tweeted via TSSMN or a control (non-tweeted) group. Measured endpoints included citations at 1 year compared with baseline, as well as article-level metrics (Altmetric score) and Twitter analytics. Independent predictors of citations were identified through univariable and multivariable regression analyses.Results. When compared with control articles, tweeted articles achieved significantly greater increase in Altmetric scores (Tweeted 9.4 +/- 5.8 vs Non-tweeted 1.0 +/- 1.8, P