From 'Normal incidents' to political crises:: Understanding the selective politicization of policy failures'
From 'Normal incidents' to political crises:: Understanding the selective politicization of policy failures'
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/1477-7053.t01-1-00016
复制
发表时间：
2003-06-01
影响因子：
2.8
通讯作者：
Kuipers, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brändström, A;Kuipers, S
本文旨在加强对政策失败中选择性政治化过程的理解，并研究政策制定者使用框架策略来分配责任的尝试。对瑞典潜艇入侵和荷兰军队参与斯雷布雷尼察陷落的政策反应是本文中使用的两个案例研究。这些案例将使用从框架文献中得出的三个角度进行分析：将事件描述为违反核心公共价值观;将事件描述为业务事件或地方性问题的症状;为危机的发生和/或“管理不善”分配问责制和责任。最后，我们提出了一个概念框架的不同形状，政治指责时，可以采取某些框架策略。
This article aims to enhance understanding of selective politicization processes in policy failures and examine the attempts of policy-makers to use framing strategies to allocate blame. The policy response to alleged submarine intrusions in Sweden and Dutch military involvement in the fall of Srebrenica are the two case-studies used in this article. These cases will be analysed using three perspectives derived from the literature on framing: depicting events as violations of core public values; depicting events as operational incidents or as symptoms of endemic problems; allocating accountability and blame for the occurrence and/or ‘mismanagement’ of crisis. Finally, we present a conceptual framework of the different shapes that political blaming can take when certain framing strategies are adopted.