Normative values for the oro-facial Esthetic Scale in Sweden
Normative values for the oro-facial Esthetic Scale in Sweden
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/joor.12121
复制
发表时间：
2014-02-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
List, T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Larsson, P.;John, M. T.;List, T.
本研究报告的调查结果和挑战的评估口面部美学在瑞典的一般人口和发展的自我报告口面部美学量表（OES）的规范值。在瑞典全国样本的1406名成年受试者（响应率：47%），OES的十分位数规范成立。分析了社会人口统计学（性别、年龄和教育）、口腔健康状况和一般健康状况对OES评分的影响。OES评分的平均值±标准差为503 ± 156个单位（0，最差评分; 70，最佳评分）; 5个OES单位），适用于口腔健康状况极佳/非常好与良好至较差或一般健康状况的受试者; ii）小（2个单位），但性别差异具有统计学意义（P=0.01）和两个年龄组（P=0.02），和（iii）没有大学与没有大学教育的受试者（P=0.31）或有和没有假牙（P=0.90）。为了估计自我报告的健康状况的规范值，仪器被认为是标准化的重要一步，开发的规范提供了一个参考框架，在一般人群中解释口面美学量表评分。
This study reports the findings and challenges of the assessment of oro-facial aesthetics in the Swedish general population and the development of normative values for the self-reporting Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES). In a Swedish national sample of 1406 adult subjects (response rate: 47%), OES decile norms were established. The influence of sociodemographics (gender, age, and education), oral health status and general health status on OES scores was analysed. Mean +/- standard deviation of OES scores was 503 +/- 156 units (0, worst score; 70, best score); 5 OES units) for subjects with excellent/very good versus good to poor oral or general health status; ii) small (2 units), but statistically significant for gender (P=0.01) and two age groups (P=0.02), and (iii) absent for subjects with college versus no college education (P=0.31) or with and without dentures (P=0.90). To estimate normative values for a self-reporting health status, instrument is considered an important step in standardisation, and the developed norms provide a frame of reference in the general population to interpret the Orofacial Esthetic Scale scores.