Picture Naming in Picture Context: Semantic Interference or Semantic Facilitation?
Picture Naming in Picture Context: Semantic Interference or Semantic Facilitation?
复制标题
图片上下文中的图片命名：语义干扰还是语义促进？
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.982
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ineke Bloem
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Heij;Karin W. Heikoop;S. Akerboom;Ineke Bloem
Glaser和Glaser（1989）的研究表明，与语义相关的语境图片相比，与语义无关的语境图片相比，与语义相关的语境图片一起命名目标图片需要更多的时间。这一发现可以在当前的语言生成模型中解释，假设在词汇层面上，两张图片的名称竞争选择。在本文中，我们认为有理由怀疑格拉泽的普遍性和格拉泽的发现。最重要的是，最近的图片命名和单词翻译研究结果强烈表明，上下文图片不会自动激活它们的名字。在实验1中，我们复制了Glaser和Glaser的语义干扰效应，但也获得了一些证据，表明这一发现是由于语境图片的错误选择造成的。在实验2中，通过采取措施简化目标图片的选择，获得了较小的语义促进效应。讨论了这一发现对语言产生模型的影响。
Summary Glaser and Glaser (1989) reported that naming a target picture takes more time when it is accompanied by a semantically related context picture than when it is accompanied by an unrelated context picture. This fi nding can be accounted for in current models of language production by assuming that at a lexical level the names of the two pictures compete for selection. In this article we argue that there are reasons to doubt the generalizability of Glaser and Glaser’s fi nding. Most importantly, results of recent picture-naming and word-translation studies strongly suggest that context pictures do not automatically activate their names. In Experiment 1 we replicated Glaser and Glaser’s semantic interference effect, but also obtained some evidence that this fi nding is due to the erroneous selection of the context picture. In Experiment 2, in which measures were taken to ease the selection of the target picture, a small semantic facilitation effect was obtained. Implications of this fi nding for models of language production are discussed.