General population norms of the Swedish short forms of Oral Health Impact Profile
General population norms of the Swedish short forms of Oral Health Impact Profile
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/joor.12137
复制
发表时间：
2014-04-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
List, T.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Larsson, P.;John, M. T.;List, T.
我们报告了瑞典14项和5项口腔健康影响简表的开发和心理测量学评估。14个项目的版本是从斯莱德在1997年开发的英语缩写形式衍生出来的。这个由五个项目组成的版本源于约翰·埃塔尔开发的德语缩写。在2006年。在瑞典成年人群中随机抽样(回应率：46%，N=1366名受试者)，确定了这两个简明形式的总分的效度、信度和标准值。有足够的OHRQOL信息来计算总分(N=1309)的受试者平均年龄为50中心点1+/-17中心点4岁，其中54%是女性。简表总分与OHIP-S(r&>=0中心点97，OHIP-S5=0中心点92)和口腔健康自评(r&>=0中心点41)高度相关。用Cronbach‘s Alpha(OHIP-S14的0中心点91，OHIP-S5的0中心点77)测量的可靠性是足够的。在一般人群中，50%的受试者具有<gt；=2的OHIP-S14分，10%的受试者具有<gt；=11分。在只有自己的牙齿和/或固定义齿和部分可移动义齿的受试者中，50%的人群>；=2 OHIP-S14得分，10%的人>；=11分。对于有全口义齿的受试者，相应的数字分别为3分和24分。三组人群OHIP-S5中位数分别为1分、1分和2分。瑞典人编制的14项和5项OHIP简写形式具有足够的心理测量学特性，并提供了瑞典受损的OHRQOL的详细概述。这些规范将为今后的研究提供参考价值。
We reported the development and psychometric evaluation of a Swedish 14-item and a five-item short form of the Oral Health Impact Profile. The 14-item version was derived from the English-language short form developed by Slade in1997. The five-item version was derived from the German-language short form developed by John etal. in 2006. Validity, reliability and normative values for the two short form summary scores were determined in a random sample of the adult Swedish population (response rate: 46%, N=1366 subjects). Subjects with sufficient OHRQoL information to calculate a summary score (N=1309) were on average 50 center dot 1 +/- 17 center dot 4years old, and 54% were women. Short form summary scores correlated highly with the 49-item OHIP-S (r >= 0 center dot 97 for OHIP-S14, r >= 0 center dot 92 for OHIP-S5) and with self-report of oral health (r >= 0 center dot 41). Reliability, measured with Cronbach's alpha (0 center dot 91 for OHIP-S14, 0 center dot 77 for OHIP-S5), was sufficient. In the general population, 50% of the subjects had >= 2 OHIP-S14 score points and 10% had >= 11 points, respectively. Among subjects with their own teeth only and/or fixed dental prostheses and with partial removable dental prostheses, 50% of the population had >= 2 OHIP-S14 score points, and 10% had >= 11 points. For subjects with complete dentures, the corresponding figures were 3 and 24 points. OHIP-S5 medians for subjects in the three population groups were 1, 1 and 2 points. Swedish 14-item and 5-item short forms of the OHIP have sufficient psychometric properties and provide a detailed overview about impaired OHRQoL in Sweden. The norms will serve as reference values for future studies.